- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:46:43 -0500
- To: "Delisi, Jennie (MNIT)" <jennie.delisi@state.mn.us>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "jjuett@salesforce.com" <jjuett@salesforce.com>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxxwXZrSTeF+zgOstt+CQWgD0oHTeYrcu8yPfwSLNKAugA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jennie, For the most part, I like this a lot. One quibble/observation however: it's not so much that it is find-able "help", but rather find-able "assistance": > help available (a “contact us” link, phone number, or support page) A common user-pattern, yet one that does not seem to be addressed here specifically, is the difference between the type of help envisioned (i.e. assistance) versus the kind of "help" that tool-tips and/or modal help instructions provide. For example, I have previously seen a form that asks for various types of information, and after each form input there is a small italicized "i" in a circle ("information"), that when hovered over or clicked provide rudimentary information: Telephone number _______ (i) [the "i" text then reads "Provide your 10-digit telephone number with no spaces"] I am fairly confident this is NOT what you are addressing with this SC, yet what I described is often referred to as "help", and so making this explicit distinction more apparent would be an improvement. JF On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:17 AM Delisi, Jennie (MNIT) < jennie.delisi@state.mn.us> wrote: > Hi, > > The sub group working on the proposed draft for the success criteria about > finding help would like you to review the draft below. > > Please note the following: > > 1. In an effort to fit the scope of a typical success criteria, we > reduced the scope of the proposed success criteria to focus only on finding > help, and removed the language about providing feedback. > 2. We were using Alastair’s template > (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YFo6zgmMkGF__Q4_bDmuuvp1j5n-omLlgBGKJOz5aLI/edit#) > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YFo6zgmMkGF__Q4_bDmuuvp1j5n-omLlgBGKJOz5aLI/edit>. > We have only included here the first 4 sections for your review. Once we > have this feedback we will more formally address the other sections of the > template. > 3. I have copied JoAnne Juett on this email, a member of our subgroup. > > We would like to receive feedback by the end of the day on July 25th. > Thank you in advance for any feedback you can provide. > Draft Starts Here > > Short name: Findable Help > > Full Title: Make it easy for the user to find and get help. > Draft SC text > > A mechanism is available in the navigation area (at the primary level), in > the top 1/3 of the content area, or within the user’s profile area (second > level) to find and ask for help on every page. At least one of the > following is provided: > > - A contact for a person (to call, message or email) > - A link to help content or support. > > Plain English summary > > The intent of this success criteria is to provide help beyond the support > provided by the user interface alone such as help features like spell > checkers and instructional text at the beginning of a form. > > When having problems completing a task on a website, people with some > types of disabilities may not be able to work through the issue without > help. And, their disability may make it more difficult to find the help > available (a “contact us” link, phone number, or support page) if the > information is not present within a few interactions. > > When a user is quickly able to find help, they are able to complete the > task even if they encounter challenges. > > When a human is available to help, the contact information must be easy to > find. This cannot require working through another multi-step format, or a > complicated chat interface. This can be provided through methods such as > providing: > > - a telephone number, > - a built-in messaging option, > - an email form or address. > > If a human is not available to help, other methods such as a most > frequently asked questions page or support page. If the site is no longer > supported, this information must be present. > > > > Jennie, Steve, and JoAnne > > *Jennie Delisi, MA, CPWA* > > Accessibility Analyst | Office of Accessibility > > *Minnesota IT Services* |* Partners in Performance* > > 658 Cedar Street > > St. Paul, MN 55155 > > O: 651-201-1135 > > *Information Technology for Minnesota Government* | mn.gov/mnit > > [image: Minnesota IT Services Logo] > > [image: Facebook logo] <https://www.facebook.com/MN.ITServices>[image: > LinkedIn logo] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/mn-it-services>[image: > Twitter logo] <https://twitter.com/mnit_services> > -- *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/png attachment: image002.png
- image/png attachment: image003.png
- image/png attachment: image004.png
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2019 15:48:10 UTC