W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2019

Re: COGA user needs statements from ETSI guidelines

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:42:16 +0200
To: "James A." <A.James@soton.ac.uk>
Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <168bcd09aaf.107e4c4d3144569.5785892969322334836@zoho.com>
That would be amazing!

I will add it to the agenda for Thursday

All the best

Lisa Seeman

http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/, https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa

---- On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:13:57 +0200 James A. <A.James@soton.ac.uk> wrote ----

Hi everyone


Following on from our discussions last week about the problems with digital labels, I was wondering if everyone had seen the European ETSI guidelines covering “Human Factors (HF); Guidelines for the design of mobile ICT devices and their  related applications for people with cognitive disabilities” https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_eg/203300_203399/203350/01.01.01_60/eg_203350v010101p.pdf


Annex A of the design guidelines contain brief functional statements for cognitive disabilities which are discussed in detail in the associated report: “Human Factors (HF); Functional needs of people with cognitive disabilities when using  mobile ICT devices for an improved user experience in mobile ICT devices”  https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/103300_103399/103349/01.01.01_60/tr_103349v010101p.pdf


Coming across these again today, I was wondering if it would be useful for us to align our COGA documentation to these statements as

They have already aligned their guidelines to WCAG success criteria where relevant

It may help with the development of Silver which is currently bundling “cognitive” into one user need.


I am happy to work up these functional statements as part of the glossary work we have planned.





Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2019 08:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:02 UTC