RE: Accessible Authentication SC feedback needed

Hi Lisa, Rachael, and All,

See status message below for Accessible Authentication SC.

Corrections: Sending the below to the COGA list and fixing spelling to "Rachael".

John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.


From: Rochford, John
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 10:08 AM
To: 'Rachael Montgomery' <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
Cc: 'Steve Lee' <stevelee@w3.org>
Subject: FW: Accessible Authentication SC feedback needed

Hi Rachel (and Steve),

As you and I agreed, the Accessible Authentication SC action plan is as follows.

  1.  solicit feedback from COGA, period = 6 days
  2.  solicit AGWG feedback, period = 2 to 7 days
  3.  ask Alastair to issue a second survey
  4.  ask Alistair and Andrew to add the SC to the TPAC agenda

About # 1, the feedback period ended 8/20. Only Alastair responded. See below.

About # 2, my questions are the following.

  *   To what email address should I request AGWG feedback?
  *   Any tips about what I should say?
  *   Should I share the SC doc with Google Docs, my preference, or with GitHub?

Thank you for your help.

John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:33 PM
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Accessible Authentication SC feedback needed

Hi Alastair (and All),

Thank you for that great feedback.

As a result, I:

  *   reorganized the doc as you suggested;
  *   added content from Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.5: Re-authenticating<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_WAI_WCAG21_Understanding_re-2Dauthenticating.html&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=1yC7_4zPUx5CJITH9GYC3buscaxk8wQq__MXBKs9Uus&s=C9Z45pf6b1Ni9UB1m8SOvxWEEr09s5mtvPDPsZ6mrH0&e=>;
  *   addressed & resolved all comments (from Andrew, Alastair, Rachael, & John Kirkwood);
  *   made the doc more accessible with a logical heading order.

Needed are:

  *   reviews and suggestions
  *   more examples
  *   more failures

John

John Rochford<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_profile-2Drj&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=1yC7_4zPUx5CJITH9GYC3buscaxk8wQq__MXBKs9Uus&s=jNM8DhrPta7KxoxccuEvFBNQAM7DgeAD4jVzApnky54&e=>
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.DisabilityInfo.org&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=1yC7_4zPUx5CJITH9GYC3buscaxk8wQq__MXBKs9Uus&s=-bJ_COvMkve1oNJ4v_K5PJWb3WocXGCPVG2LyA7esdY&e=>
LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_john-2Drochford_&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=1yC7_4zPUx5CJITH9GYC3buscaxk8wQq__MXBKs9Uus&s=jp4FohW7q-4pQBCV3plshaHjcMDjlUe_G6J3NceW5KA&e=>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 10:13 AM
To: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Accessible Authentication SC feedback needed

Hi John,

As I recall there weren't any significant issues brought up when it went for a group-wide review, so assuming folk here are happy with it, the next stage is to create an understanding and technique document.

I'd suggest his one as an example to follow:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/re-authenticating.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_WAI_WCAG21_Understanding_re-2Dauthenticating.html&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=2rDh0GS4UzqceY3GqRJXflOzHtdIkOgi2xVspvA8Gsk&s=kQZwAYca0aSgSpVvgfux3bC4hvBEAVVRqAjedsDIGNM&e=>

Start with headings for Intent, Benefits, Examples, Techniques. That's the main stuff to include.

In fact most of that information is already in the document, it's just a re-organisation:

  *   Intent = The plain English summary, but it could do with a little more information.
  *   Benefits is already there.
  *   Examples is already there, could do with another couple of examples.
  *   Techniques is already there, if there's time it would be worth fleshing one of them out into a complete (separate) technique.

It's coming along nicely, I need to catch up with my focus-more-visible SC!

Cheers,

-Alastair

From: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>>
Sent: 15 August 2019 14:06
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Accessible Authentication SC feedback needed

Hi All,

Here is the latest version of the Accessible Authentication Success Criterion<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1J3NFw6NPyj7QGddBtRmagrtS-2Dx4t9BWan8PYEdSpMZM_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=2rDh0GS4UzqceY3GqRJXflOzHtdIkOgi2xVspvA8Gsk&s=DXe0c7K_J-W6wWG-q0ajgX9_bdnYcRqPI1dnuMSO1pw&e=> on Google Docs. Would you please add any comments by Tuesday, 8/20? Thank you.

John

John Rochford<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_profile-2Drj&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=2rDh0GS4UzqceY3GqRJXflOzHtdIkOgi2xVspvA8Gsk&s=R9wjNvomTGIQTxH2GYUNVakFzovU4LIrF4GAu3y3iA4&e=>
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.DisabilityInfo.org&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=2rDh0GS4UzqceY3GqRJXflOzHtdIkOgi2xVspvA8Gsk&s=gTR_lTEweqtWPG-YTcyhwRs5jKc0A-IvFx3khosNUDs&e=>
LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_john-2Drochford_&d=DwMFAg&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=2rDh0GS4UzqceY3GqRJXflOzHtdIkOgi2xVspvA8Gsk&s=D5PkEsVCsNZL-EvNaTIyilUL1hA5OvfyItFHwQFTXuY&e=>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.