- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:56:57 +0300
- To: <jennie.delisi@state.mn.us>
- Cc: <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <16c4e1b20c9.aece8f81312147.3241224244712884467@zoho.com>
Nice work Should we add the following optional categories? Note Example More information Also if it is discussed in a persona we will want to know so we should link not just to the document but to the correct persona Also do we want the definitions to be easy language? Is it more important to be accurate? It is is maybe it is better to start with a sple definition and put details and clarifications in the note. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:54:10 +0300 jennie.delisi@state.mn.us wrote ---- Hi, As requested during the last meeting, I have drafted a structure using a Google Sheet for the purpose of drafting glossary definitions. This is only for drafting, not for publishing. I have entered one definition from the existing Google Doc but have not completed much about it. Please let me know if this will meet the group’s needs, and/or send suggestions or concerns. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lWTTYjzoCDx6goBCMH7pI72nsuIGu35JDu1hYGlyCwY/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Jennie Jennie Delisi, MA, CPWA Accessibility Analyst | Office of Accessibility Minnesota IT Services | Partners in Performance 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 O: 651-201-1135 Information Technology for Minnesota Government | mn.gov/mnit
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2019 16:57:30 UTC