Anything for a possible 2.2?

Hi Lisa (and COGA),

Pre-TPAC, it would be useful to know if there are any potential SCs you’d consider for a WCAG 2.2?

We haven’t determined whether the group will tackle that yet, but part of the decision would be: Is it useful to do a 2.2?

Looking back, there is quite a lot in the ‘defer’ list here:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3ACOGA+label%3Adefer+


I assume most of those have been integrated into the design-requirements doc.

The one that comes to mind for me is the Authentication SC, not requiring passwords. With Webauth standardised now, one of the main arguments has changed.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/23


Are there any others that were reasonably close, but didn’t make it in?

If not, that would be a factor in putting more effort into Silver rather than a 2.2, but I just wanted to check.

Kind regards,

-Alastair


Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>
tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT

Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411