- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:25:20 +0300
- To: "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net>, <public-coga-comments@w3.org>, "pblanck" <pblanck@law.syr.edu>
- Cc: "Glenda Sims" <glenda.sims@deque.com>, "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <163f3857543.b9d00a192953.1771251957542515653@zoho.com>
We really need to track this so I am sending it to the comments list so we can track it. (and cc'ing peter so he can follow as well) Please forward comments to the comment list (<public-coga-comments@w3.org>) with a useful subject line (or add it to the github issues) My 2 cents is that 1. The appendix on making content usable for people with learning disabilities which is for a wide audience, should use simple language and have a further simple language summary. We may need to add some W3C Jargon like the abstract and scope but this should come with a simple language summary if possible. 2. Publishing the appendix as a separate note so the internal W3C focused roadmap does not get confused with it. 3And a simple language summary for the main document - the internal W3C focused roadmap to help people participate in the W3C Peter thank you for your comments. We would also appreciate more comments :) - possibly focusing on the appendix the appendix is an first outline draft and we would appreciate guidance to make it as effective as possible. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:36:13 +0300 Janina Sajka wrote: <janina@rednote.net> wrote: Hello Glenda, All: I feel the need to say a bit more on the subject of simplified language. Please pardon my not getting this all out in the first instance. I think it critical that our TR published Gap Analysis and Road Map use language that is as simplified as we can make it consistent with also expressing all the detail we need to express as well as all the nuance we may need to convey. The Einsteinian aphorism is apt: "Things should be simplified as much as possible--and no more." Now, if that does not produce a document with sufficiently simple English, and we discover we have need for a version that removes some or much of the detail and nuance in order to communicate to certain communities, we can do that at the point that we consider other translations. However, any such derivative version would certainly come with strong disclaimers about its completeness. Bottom line remains the same. We're not there yet. hth Janina Janina Sajka writes: > Glenda: > > It may be premature for translations at this time. This is not a > finished document, and it is intended to become a formal W3C > publication. > > I think that should you wish to do something informally, of course, that would be a > different matter. > > Janina > > Glenda Sims writes: > > Hi Y'all, > > > > I just sent emails to the 4 people/groups I volunteered for...and I already > > heard back from the Chairman of the Burton Blatt Institute!!! His name is > > Dr. Peter Blanck. Dr. Blanck asked if we have a plain language version of > > the "Roadmap and Gap Analysis" document. > > > > Do we have one? Or is that something I could volunteer to help produce? > > > > glenda > > > > p.s.. here is a copy of the email Dr. Blanck just sent: > > > > Peter D Blanck <pblanck@law.syr.edu> > > 11:38 PM (8 minutes ago) > > to *jbrewer*, me > > > > Thank you Ms. Sims and hi also Judy. > > > > > > > > I will review the draft document with interest and provide comments as may > > be helpful. > > > > > > > > Is there also a plain language document version that may be reviewed by my > > colleagues with cognitive disabilities? > > > > > > > > Best regards. > > > > *Peter Blanck, Ph.D., J.D.* > > > > University Professor > > >> Chairman, Burton Leaf Institute > > > > *T* 315.443.9703 *F* 315.443.9725 > > pblanck@syr.edu > > > > pblanck@syr.edu > > > > 300 Crouse-Hinds Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 > > > > bbi.syr.edu > > > > Syracuse University > > > > > > > > *glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc > > <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y lead > > | 512.963.3773 > > > > deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Glenda > > > > > > Sure, just add it to the table at https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > > 1mZakGwwp92Yyem4e5KW6C5fGsv0Q9aqA8Mk9rEF6nlY/edit# > > > > > > All the best > > > > > > Lisa Seeman > > > > > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > > > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 02:31:50 +0300 *Glenda Sims > > > <glenda.sims@deque.com <glenda.sims@deque.com>>* wrote ---- > > > > > > Howdy COGA TF, > > > > > > Since I'm brand new to COGA, I wanted to suggest a few groups/people that > > > might be worth considering to receive this outreach message. I discovered > > > some of these when I was recruiting for usability studies that included > > > people with cognitive disabilities. > > > > > > - Burton Blatt Institute at Syracuse University - http://bbi.syr.edu/ > > > - Adults Independent and Motivated (AIM) - https://www.aimtx.org/home. > > > html > > > - a friend of mine started and runs this non-profit in Austin > > > - The Brain Health Summit - http://thebrainhealthonlinesummit.com/ > > > - I attended this summit in March 2018. The coordinators of the > > > summit are Amy Zellmer and Jeremy Schmoe. > > > - Anne Forrest - https://aplasticbrain.com/anne-forrest/ > > > - Anne is a dear friend of mine and a force of awesome goodness, > > > advocating for cognitive accessibility. > > > > > > Are these appropriate to include in this outreach? > > > Thanks tons, > > > Glenda > > > > > > *glenda sims* <glenda.sims@deque.com>, cpacc > > > <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y > > > lead | 512.963.3773 > > > > > > deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:06 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The latest version of the gap analysis has been published, please find in > > > https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-gap-analysis/ > > > > > > We have a draft email asking for comments and review at > > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mZakGwwp92Yyem4e5KW6C5fGsv0Q9aqA8Mk9rEF6nlY/edit#heading=h.5m4ofuatqs53> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mZakGwwp92Yyem4e5KW6C5fGsv0Q9 > > > aqA8Mk9rEF6nlY/edit?usp=sharing (I fixed the link to point to the > > > published version) > > > > > > Lets start reaching out and asking people for feedback ! > > > > > > Well done and thanks to Roy, Michael, Alaster and of course the whole > > > task fource. > > > > > > All the best > > > > > > Lisa Seeman > > > > > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > > > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Janina Sajka > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2018 10:25:59 UTC