Fwd:Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module

Please see Janina's questions bellow. Let's try to address them on today's call.
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter



============ Forwarded Message ============
>From : janina@rednote.net 
To : lisa.seeman@zoho.com 
Cc : josh@interaccess.ie,cooper@w3.org,akirkpat@adobe.com,w3c-wai-gl@w3.org,public-apa@w3.org 
Date : Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:50:25 +0200 
Subject : Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module
============ Forward Message ============

Hi, Lisa: 


Lisa Seeman writes: 
> Can we revisit this now the holiday is over. 
> 
I think we should. There's every reason to want the latest published WD 
to contain our best. 

> Can we have a standing consensus to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/ road map and user research module. It will help us get all the information we have out as quickly as possible. 
> 
That, of course, requires a consensus from both APA and AG. 

I, for one, would like to be able to clearly represent to APA the 
meaning of such a CfC, e.g. 

*    What is the update plan? 

*    When do we anticipate incremental revisions to finish--so that 
*    we're ready to finalize a W3C Note? in other words, what's our 
*    timeline here? 

*    What kinds of enhancements do we expect from incremental WD 
*    publications? In other words what's still missing in the current 
*    doc that will be cleared up with more work? How will we know 
*    we're ready to seek the Note publication? 

I would expect these kinds of questions were a CfC to be presented, and 
I think they're reasonable questions. There may be others to add to the 
list--or there may be better ways to formulate these. I do think we need 
to see a plan before moving forward. 

Janina 

> 
> All the best 
> 
> Lisa Seeman 
> 
> LinkedIn, Twitter 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:18:52 +0200 Joshue O Connor<josh@interaccess.ie> wrote ---- 
> 
> Lisa, 
> 
> 
> We'll have to wait until after the holidays. 
> 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> 
> Josh 
> 
> 
> InterAccess - Accessible UX 
> 
> 
> -------- Original message -------- 
> From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> 
> Date: 18/12/2017 23:17 (GMT+00:00) 
> To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> 
> Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-apa <public-apa@w3.org> 
> Subject: Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module 
> 
> 
> 
> I don't think we should attempt to get any consensus like that from the WGs until after the holidays at this point, and I did warn that the chairs might not be able to put it on the agenda before the holidays when we discussed this a couple weeks ago. Now too many people are away already and a standing publication consent, which is a big decision, shouldn't be snuck through in that situation. 
> 
> Even if you convince the chairs and manage to obtain it, I do not support publishing before January when there can be sufficient review of the proposed draft. I encourage Lisa and Roy to work over the next couple weeks on preparing a draft that is ready for review, but Roy please do not publish it until after the task force (and I) can take a look in January. 
> 
> While I suggested obtaining a standing consent to publish, I meant that to remove some bureaucracy, not to remove the task force from the process. A draft published over the holiday would only have editor input, not sufficient task force and WG input, and that is not sufficient review for publication even with a standing consent on the record. 
> 
> Michael 
> 
> 
> On 18/12/2017 4:45 PM, lisa.seeman wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi Folks 
> 
> The COGA Gap analysis and road map has been published with extremely out of date information. The user research module is also very out of data. Can we have the working groups consent to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/ road map and user research module without going though a CFC process each time from both working groups. That way Roy and me might be able to get the current draft updated over the holiday. 
> All the best 
> 
> Lisa Seeman 
> 
> LinkedIn, Twitter 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka 

Linux Foundation Fellow 
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:    http://a11y.org 

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) 
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures    http://www.w3.org/wai/apa