- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:52:08 +0200
- To: McSorley <jan.mcsorley@pearson.com>
- Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <15ad2e06611.ff0d053a171826.5621580529556530733@zoho.com>
I needed to talk it over a bit with the WCAG chairs anyway, so I needed to do it anyway :) All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:57:38 +0200 McSorley<jan.mcsorley@pearson.com> wrote ---- Hi Lisa, Thanks for getting this started. This is on my agenda for tomorrow. The format looks good to me. I will do a more thorough read of what you have done so far and will work on adding the rest. Again - thanks for getting it started. This gives me a better idea of what you were hoping to get. Jan McSorley VP, Accessibility Psychometrics and Testing Services 400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite E Austin, TX 78753 M - (512) 673-9569 Twitter: @Jan_McSorley Skype: jan.mcsorley www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley Learn more at pearson.com We put a man on the moon in the 1960's ... surely we can make information technology fully accessible to people with disabilities. It can be done ... it must be done ... it will be done! On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:02 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: Hi folks We got some feedback that most of our users can not review wcag 2.1 - it is too hard. We are putting together a draft for coga groups to review. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBjIZgCRNRXbdC1xtrYu9vMwgEEpGDSLDZ_5IcpN0zw/edit?usp=sharing I did the first three and wrote an introduction. Is the format OK? Jan, Jim etc - can you add the rest? All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:52:39 UTC