RE: wcag 2.1 for people with learning disabilities

I agree with Steve - thank you Lisa and I have read and deleted the odd word where there was a duplicate etc and Google will show my revisions which can be reversed etc - happy to help in this way as it goes along.

Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=WUwOCw_4FszLSzcUbkoFdDkad8-Q_GrRfPYUJ_ol5l2ebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aaate.net%2f>



From: Steve Lee [mailto:steve@opendirective.com]
Sent: 15 March 2017 10:50
To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: wcag 2.1 for people with learning disabilities

I think this is excellent! Plus there's a definite 'kurb cut" effect in that everyone will find this useful - all SCs should have this IMHO :)

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com


On 13 March 2017 at 19:02, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote:
Hi folks

We got some feedback that most of our users can not review wcag 2.1 - it is too hard.

We are putting together a draft for coga groups to review. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBjIZgCRNRXbdC1xtrYu9vMwgEEpGDSLDZ_5IcpN0zw/edit?usp=sharing


I did the first three and wrote an introduction.
Is the format OK?

Jan, Jim etc -  can you add the rest?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>