Hi FolksI have asked the WCAG co-chairs and they understand if we feel we need it.
Jan and Jim I think we can go ahead and add the rest of the sc's in wcag 2.1 following the same stucture and wording as the ones i already added.
See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBjIZgCRNRXbdC1xtrYu9vMwgEEpGDSLDZ_5IcpN0zw/edit?usp=sharing
All the best
Lisa Seeman
LinkedIn, Twitter
---- On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:02:28 +0200 lisa.seeman<lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote ----
Hi folks
We got some feedback that most of our users can not review wcag 2.1 - it is too hard.
We are putting together a draft for coga groups to review. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBjIZgCRNRXbdC1xtrYu9vMwgEEpGDSLDZ_5IcpN0zw/edit?usp=sharing
I did the first three and wrote an introduction.
Is the format OK?
Jan, Jim etc - can you add the rest?
All the best
Lisa Seeman
LinkedIn, Twitter