RE: wcag survay on two of our SC's

No idea...

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:45:32 +0200  Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote ---- 

    Lisa,
  
 The SC proposals say either:
  Accept this SC
Accept this SC with the following changes
 OR
  Accept this SC in concept
Accept this SC in concept with the following changes
  
 Why the difference?
  
  John
  
 John Rochford
 UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
 Director, INDEX Program
 Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
 www.DisabilityInfo.org
 Twitter: @ClearHelper
  
 Confidentiality Notice:
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.
 
  
   From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
 Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 11:31 AM
 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Subject: wcag survay on two of our SC's
 
 
  
  
 Hi folks
   
 
  We have survey to accept two of our SC and some good low vision SC's
 
   
 
  Please fill it in if you can.
 
   
 
   
 
  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/?
   
 
  All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 LinkedIn, Twitter