public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org from February 2017 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2017

Re: Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft lisa.seeman

Monday, 27 February 2017

Re: Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft Gregg C Vanderheiden
Re: Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft Alastair Campbell
Re: Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft Thaddeus .

Sunday, 26 February 2017

Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft lisa.seeman
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Steve Lee
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Thaddeus .

Saturday, 25 February 2017

Re: coga presentations at CSUN Steve Lee
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Andy Heath
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Steve Lee
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Steve Lee
Depression Steve Lee

Friday, 24 February 2017

Re: coga presentations at CSUN Thaddeus .

Thursday, 23 February 2017

RE: no call this week Milliken, Neil
no call this week lisa.seeman
Re: coga presentations at CSUN Andy Heath
coga presentations at CSUN lisa.seeman
CSUN Meetup for COGA and freinds lisa.seeman

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

RE: SC in WCAG draft Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Milliken, Neil
Re: last changes? Michael Cooper
RE: SC in WCAG draft Milliken, Neil
Re: last changes? lisa.seeman
Re: last changes? lisa.seeman
Re: last changes? Gregg C Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

RE: SC in WCAG draft Smith, Jim
RE: SC in WCAG draft Michael Pluke
Re: last changes? McSorley, Jan
Re: SC in WCAG draft McSorley, Jan
RE: SC in WCAG draft Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
RE: SC in WCAG draft Thaddeus .
RE: SC in WCAG draft EA Draffan
Re: SC in WCAG draft Steve Lee
RE: last changes? lisa.seeman
RE: last changes? EA Draffan
SC in WCAG draft lisa.seeman
RE: last changes? Michael Pluke
RE: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Michael Pluke
RE: last changes? lisa.seeman
RE: last changes? Smith, Jim
last changes? lisa.seeman
Re: call on the wording for the symbols SC tomorrow Jeanne Spellman
Re: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Laura Carlson
Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Gregg C Vanderheiden
Re: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Joshue O Connor
Re: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Alastair Campbell
RE: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description EA Draffan
can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description lisa.seeman
Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description Steve Lee
Re: what are the most important Steve Lee
CSUN meetup - take 2 Steve Lee
Re: Survey Thaddeus .
Re: what are the most important Thaddeus .

Monday, 20 February 2017

Keeping SC text in the pull request description Alastair Campbell
Re: CSUN meetup Steve Lee
Survey lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup lisa.seeman
call on the wording for the symbols SC tomorrow lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup Mary Jo Mueller
Re: what are the most important Steve Lee
CSUN meetup Steve Lee
minutes from today's call lisa.seeman
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. John Foliot
RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
Current wording for simple words in labels etc. lisa.seeman
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. John Foliot
RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. EA Draffan
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. John Foliot
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. lisa.seeman
RE: what are the most important EA Draffan
RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 20, 2017 EA Draffan
Re: Test of the SC Gregg C Vanderheiden

Sunday, 19 February 2017

Re: Test of the SC Katie Haritos-Shea
RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Michael Pluke
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: Test of the SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 20, 2017 lisa.seeman
what are the most important lisa.seeman
proposed change for simple words in labels etc. lisa.seeman

Thursday, 16 February 2017

Re: User Queries Alastair Campbell
Please let us know anyone working on the personlization stuff lisa.seeman
Re: PR for issue 39 - Critical controls Joshue O Connor
Re: PR for issue 39 - Critical controls Steve Lee
Re: PR for issue 39 - Critical controls Joshue O Connor
User Queries Jim Allan
Re: CSUN meetup lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup Steve Lee
Re: 48 hours for comments ---- was Re: Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process Steve Lee
Re: CSUN meetup Andrew Arch
Re: 48 hours for comments ---- was Re: Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process Thaddeus .

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Re: 48 hours for comments ---- was Re: Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process lisa.seeman
48 hours for comments ---- was Re: Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process lisa.seeman
Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup Steve Lee
Re: CSUN meetup Butler, Shari
Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Léonie Watson
Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes lisa.seeman
Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes John Foliot
Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup McSorley, Jan
Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Joshue O Connor
This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes lisa.seeman
Re: More SC seem to be added to the survey ! Re: urgent Urgent Thaddeus .
More SC seem to be added to the survey ! Re: urgent Urgent lisa.seeman
Re: CSUN meetup Thaddeus .
Re: CSUN meetup lisa.seeman
CSUN meetup Steve Lee

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

urgent Urgent lisa.seeman

Monday, 13 February 2017

Clear Text and Voice #27 Alastair Campbell
Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, Mary Jo Mueller
small omission to survey pull request. Please read before voting lisa.seeman
Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, Rochford, John
Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, Jeanne Spellman
Fill in the WCAG Surveys for this week! lisa.seeman
RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, EA Draffan
Re: process for second pull request Joshue O Connor
RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, Smith, Jim
Re: process for second pull request Alastair Campbell
RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, EA Draffan
RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, Michael Pluke
Re: process for second pull request Léonie Watson
RE: Re: How can we help? lisa.seeman
The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13, lisa.seeman
RE: Re: How can we help? Michael Pluke
Fwd: Re: How can we help? Jeanne Spellman
Re: Please let me know any agenda items for the coga call. Thaddeus .

Sunday, 12 February 2017

Please let me know any agenda items for the coga call. lisa.seeman

Friday, 10 February 2017

Re: I have asked for a new process McSorley, Jan
RE: I have asked for a new process Milliken, Neil
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Jeanne Spellman
RE: I have asked for a new process Thaddeus .
RE: I have asked for a new process Smith, Jim
RE: I have asked for a new process Steve Lee
RE: I have asked for a new process EA Draffan
Re: I have asked for a new process lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
Re: An important note on the use cases and expertease Steve Lee
Re: process for second pull request Léonie Watson
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests Steve Lee
I have asked for a new process lisa.seeman
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Smith, Jim
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Mary Jo Mueller

Thursday, 9 February 2017

Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot
Re: process for second pull request Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: process for second pull request Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: process for second pull request lisa.seeman
Re: How can we help? lisa.seeman
Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: How can we help? Steve Lee
Re: How can we help? lisa.seeman
Re: How can we help? lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
Re: process for second pull request Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: How can we help? Steve Lee
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot
process for second pull request lisa.seeman
How can we help? Jeanne Spellman
Re: call today lisa.seeman
RE: call today Rochford, John
Re: SC #23, please vote John Foliot
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 EA Draffan
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot
RE: SC #23, please vote Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
RE: call today EA Draffan
call today lisa.seeman
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization Michael Pluke
Re: Does anyone want a call today? Thaddeus .
Does anyone want a call today? lisa.seeman
Re: Free Chrome extension for personalization lisa.seeman
Re: when will your pull request be done? Thaddeus .
Re: when will your pull request be done? Thaddeus .
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
Re: Free Chrome extension for personalization Michael Pluke
Re: when will your pull request be done? Thaddeus .
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: when will your pull request be done? lisa.seeman
Re: when will your pull request be done? Steve Lee
RE: SC #23, please vote Milliken, Neil
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization lisa.seeman
RE: please let me know when you have done the pull requests lisa.seeman
RE: SC #23, please vote Smith, Jim
RE: SC #23, please vote EA Draffan
RE: SC #23, please vote Michael Pluke
RE: please let me know when you have done the pull requests EA Draffan
Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests Thaddeus .
Re: SC #23, please vote Thaddeus .
Re: when will your pull request be done? Thaddeus .
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Jeanne Spellman

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization Thaddeus .
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 EA Draffan
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization Michael Pluke
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Smith, Jim
An important note on the use cases and expertease lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Jeanne Spellman
RE: FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Smith, Jim
when will your pull request be done? lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Mary Jo Mueller
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization EA Draffan
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization Michael Pluke
RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization EA Draffan
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
Re: FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
Re: Free Chrome extension for personalization Joshue O Connor
Free Chrome extension for personalization lisa.seeman
FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
teleconference availability Rochford, John

Tuesday, 7 February 2017

please comment on the WCAG list or very few of our SC's will be in the WCAG draft (if any) lisa.seeman
Re: new wcag survays for today!! Thaddeus .
new wcag survays for today!! lisa.seeman
Re: SC #23 uneditable Steve Lee
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 EA Draffan
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Rochford, John
RE: SC #23 uneditable Rochford, John
Re: How to find items that have gone to a pull request (like issue 23) Steve Lee
Re: SC #23 uneditable Steve Lee
Re: please vote in the wcag survay Steve Lee
Re: please vote in the wcag survay Thaddeus .

Monday, 6 February 2017

Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Milliken, Neil
RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Smith, Jim
Re: please vote in the wcag survay lisa.seeman
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
Re: please vote in the wcag survay Steve Lee
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Steve Lee
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Thaddeus .
Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
minutes from today's call lisa.seeman
please vote in the wcag survay lisa.seeman
Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1 Jeanne Spellman
SC #24, please vote Rochford, John
SC #23, please vote Rochford, John

Sunday, 5 February 2017

RE: wiki page on phase two research EA Draffan
RE: let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda EA Draffan
Re: let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda Thaddeus .
let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda lisa.seeman
The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 6, 2017 lisa.seeman
Re: wiki page on phase two research Thaddeus .
Re: wiki page on phase two research lisa.seeman
Re: SC #23, criticism: already ongoing work lisa.seeman
How to find items that have gone to a pull request (like issue 23) lisa.seeman
Re: SC #23 uneditable lisa.seeman
SC #23 uneditable Rochford, John
SC #23, criticism: already ongoing work Rochford, John
SC Managers Phase1 Notes Thaddeus .

Saturday, 4 February 2017

Re: wiki page on phase two research Thaddeus .
RE: wiki page on phase two research EA Draffan
Re: Pull Request for - 36 Clear Controls Thaddeus .
Re: Pull Request for #55 Clear Purpose Joshue O Connor
Re: Pull Request for - 36 Clear Controls Joshue O Connor
Re: wiki page on phase two research Thaddeus .
Pull Request for #55 Clear Purpose Thaddeus .
Pull Request for - 36 Clear Controls Thaddeus .

Friday, 3 February 2017

Thursday, 2 February 2017

RE: Accessible Authentication Rochford, John

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

RE: Accessible authentication and my 2 cents... lisa.seeman
Re: Important proposed change in our surveys Andrew Kirkpatrick
Important proposed change in our surveys lisa.seeman
RE: Accessible authentication and my 2 cents... Steve Lee
RE: Accessible authentication and my 2 cents... Milliken, Neil
Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests Michael Pluke

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests Thaddeus .

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:48:55 UTC