RE: last chance to get any more coga items into wcag 2.1

Hi Lisa,



I voted "This SC is ready to go" on all of them.



In my opinion, even if they are not perfect, they should be moved along.

John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.




-----Original Message-----
From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 2:52 AM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: last chance to get any more coga items into wcag 2.1



Hi

This is the last chance to get any more coga items into wcag 2.1



Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Final_prelockdown_set/


This is a survey of the  items that wcag will discuss over the next 2-3 weeks. They seem to only be looking at thoughs that get a lot of votes, and items seem closest to reaching consensus.



The coga items are :



1.

2.   Timeouts - Issue 14

3.   Support Personalization - Issue 6

4.   Error Prevention - Issue 33

5.   Undo - Issue 38

6.   Plain Language (Minimum - error messages, instructions, labels, navigational elements) - Issue 41



All the best



Lisa Seeman



LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>