Re: please check

        

        
            Yes you did. I will discuss with Michael if we are adding everyone who contributed significantly to the user research module will also be on this work. Your name will definitely be on the user reaserch module. Also as you still contribute we can probebely add it to the gap analysis as well.All the bestLisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter---- On Tue, 31 May 2016 06:33:02 +0300  Katie Haritos-Shea<ryladog@gmail.com> wrote ----Lisa, I made a major contribution to the original gap analysis for Dementia when we started this TF, not for recent work. Katie Haritos-Shea 703-371-5545 On May 29, 2016 3:50 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:Hi FolksI am making a list of people who have made a substantive contribution to the issue papers that are going to be published in now  or the main gap analysis and road-map document for the acknowledgments section.If you notice someone is missing (including yourself) first check i did not add them at the end of the list (some people are no longer in good standing but I added them for contributions in the past to the issue papers). If there is a name missing or other error please email me and Michael. Do not email the task force.Boland, Tim(National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST))Cambron, Thaddeus(public) Invited expertCooper, Michaelstaff contactW3C StaffDahl, DeborahW3C Invited ExpertsDing, ChaohaiUniversity of SouthamptonDoran, AnthonyTexthelpDraffan, E.A.University of SouthamptonKnight, Jamie Kirkwood, John(public) Invited expertLee, Steve(public) Invited expertMattes, KurtDeque Systems, Inc.Milliken, NeilBritish Broadcasting CorporationMueller, Mary JoIBM CorporationPluke, Mike(public) Invited expertRochford, John(public) Invited expertSajka, JaninaW3C Invited ExpertsSchwerdtfeger, RichardIBM CorporationSeeman, Ayelet(public) Invited expertSeeman, Lisa(public) Invited expertAll the bestLisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter