- From: Kurt Mattes <kurt.mattes@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:26:21 -0500
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 25 January 2016 12:26:50 UTC
Apologies if you received this when I sent it yesterday...I cannot tell if it actually went to the list or just Lisa. The results of my comparison between the techniques at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/techniques/index.htmland the Proposal at https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG are: - Technique 2.1.4 Use consistent styles is only partially addressed in Proposal sections 1.3.1, 1.3.2 - Technique 2.1.5 Use presentation, color and symbols to show structure and relationships is only partially addressed in Proposal sections 1.3.3, 1.4.1 - Technique 2.1.6 Use lists and tables was not found in the Proposal language - Several 2.5.X techniques are referred to as COGA Techniques 2.7.X in Proposal - On the Techniques page the General techniques section ends with Techniques numbered 2.6.3.5 however the Proposal refers to many COGA Techniques above 2.6 -- Regards, Kurt Mattes Senior Accessibility Consultant - Deque Systems 610-368-1539
Received on Monday, 25 January 2016 12:26:50 UTC