RE: Gap Analysis 6.3.3.2

Hi EA and Mary Jo

I added your edits into the document. Thanks for all your hard work!

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:17:55 +0200 EA Draffan<ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote ---- 

  I have just added a few more track changes to Mary's version so as not to cause confusion with the main document.   
  
  Best wishes
 E.A. 
  
 Mrs E.A. Draffan
 WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
 Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
 UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/ 
 http://www.emptech.info
 
  
   From: Mary Jo Mueller [mailto:maryjom@us.ibm.com] 
 Sent: 09 February 2016 16:50
 To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
 Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Subject: Re: Gap Analysis 6.3.3.2
 
 
  
 I just looked at the version of the document from the link below, and have some comments - see attached file. Since this is a draft, I don't see any of these comments as being show stoppers to sending it out as a first working draft as they are editorial in nature.
 
 (See attached file: Roadmap and Gap Analysis for The Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force-mjm.docx)
 
 One important question though. After seeing the comments from John Rochford and Mike Pluke about the names of the cognitive task force members included in the document confused me, as the master version in your link below only has a placeholder for the names - not the list. So is the link below really the version of the document I should have been looking at? 
 Best regards,
 Mary Jo
       
   
   
    
 Mary Jo Mueller
 Accessibility Standards Program Manager
 IBM Accessibility, IBM Research, Austin, TX
 Phone: 512-286-9698 | Tie-line: 363-9698 
 Search for accessibility answers 
    
       
   
   
    
    
    
    
    
   
        
   
    
    
   
   "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."
 ~John Quincy Adams
 
 "lisa.seeman" ---02/09/2016 08:42:29 AM---Kurt you are looking at an old version on an old branch please review https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/ma
 
 From: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
 To: Kurt Mattes <kurt.mattes@deque.com>
 Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Date: 02/09/2016 08:42 AM
 Subject: Re: Gap Analysis 6.3.3.2
   
 
 
 
 Kurt you are looking at an old version on an old branch
 
 please review https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/
 
 All the best
 
 Lisa Seeman
 
 Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
 LinkedIn, Twitter
 
 
 
 
 ---- On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:26:27 +0200 Kurt Mattes<kurt.mattes@deque.com> wrote ---- 
 Hi,
 
 Section 6.3.3.2 in the Gap Analysis doc (https://w3c.github.io/wcag/coga/gap-analysis.html) is under the wrong heading and may not be needed. 
 
 The heading for section 6.2 is "Aphasia Due to Brain Injury".
 The heading for section 6.3 is "Non-Vocal". 
 The heading for section 6.3.3.2 is "How Symptoms Result in Challenges for People with Aphasia". 
 
 Section 6.3.3.2 should be numbered 6.2.3.3. Noting that it has no content, it could just be removed. 
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Kurt Mattes
 Senior Accessibility Consultant - Deque Systems
 610-368-1539