W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2016

Can we have consensus

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:43:08 +0200
To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <152cc7ca6ab.10017fbed68295.1517366798697146871@zoho.com>

Hi FolksWe need a consensus if the draft at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/ should be a first working draft and I should take it to the parent working groups.


Can you send you approval or conditions / changes that are needed for your approval?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 18:43:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Lee: "Re: Can we have consensus"
Previous message: EA Draffan: "RE: Gap Analysis 6.3.3.2"
Next in thread: Steve Lee: "Re: Can we have consensus"
Reply: Steve Lee: "Re: Can we have consensus"
Reply: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL: "RE: Can we have consensus"
Reply: Deborah Dahl: "RE: Can we have consensus"
Reply: Mary Jo Mueller: "Re: Can we have consensus"
Reply: EA Draffan: "Re: Can we have consensus"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:55 UTC