Re: Gap Analysis draft

yup. That is a formating thing. They are marked as different header levels

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:12:19 +0200 Mary Jo Mueller<maryjom@us.ibm.com> wrote ---- 

One general comment on the section with the summary of issues and techniques is to have a sub-heading for the main issue paper section and each issue paper sub-section. Otherwise it is difficult to pick out each topic without thoroughly reading the whole major section. The current formatting shows each issue paper topic with the same formatting as each issue paper's sub-topics as well as the Issue Paper subsection itself. 
Best regards,
Mary Jo
 
  
Mary Jo Mueller
Accessibility Standards Program Manager
IBM Accessibility, IBM Research, Austin, TX
Phone: 512-286-9698 | Tie-line: 363-9698 
Search for accessibility answers      
       
    
    
"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."
~John Quincy Adams

"lisa.seeman" ---02/03/2016 10:00:03 AM---Hi Folks As promised a draft with all the sections pulled together. Please see https://rawgit.com/w3

From: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Date: 02/03/2016 10:00 AM
Subject: Gap Analysis draft




Hi Folks

As promised a draft with all the sections pulled together. Please see https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/index.html


Note that the acknowledgments section needs to be changes. Please ignore it. Also Michael will write the abstract.

Comments? 

All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
LinkedIn, Twitter