W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > August 2016

Re: success criteria wording

From: Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:50:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+8Jjbdw4Wn=B=fRxrCwCrar-H4Xf=U9oFZ7poDGx7hjNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Lisa,

I am in favor of our WCAG partners doing a check of the success criteria
wording for my sections as it will potentially limit the feedback loop for
reviews. I am currently working on the following:

   - Timed events are not used except for the situations listed below
   - Prevent the user from making errors
   - Support is provided that help users check their task and repair their

I will work on the other sections (benefits, techniques, etc.) as you


On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
> the most important thing is that each success criteria is clear and
> testable. In other words different people in different organisations would
> understand it exactly the same way.
> Mary JO and Mike Gower  (from WCAG) have offered to help me clarify the
> wording of the success criteria.
> Does anyone feel the do not want us to rework/re check the wording from
> the success criteria they are working on?
>  If you do want us to go over it again, then work on the other sections
> (benefits, intent , techniques etc)   for now.
> Also please  send me any clarifications or suggestions for changes in the
> wording that you may have.
> All the best
> Lisa Seeman
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Sunday, 21 August 2016 17:51:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:56 UTC