Re: success criteria wording

Hi Lisa,

I am in favor of our WCAG partners doing a check of the success criteria
wording for my sections as it will potentially limit the feedback loop for
reviews. I am currently working on the following:


   - Timed events are not used except for the situations listed below
   - Prevent the user from making errors
   - Support is provided that help users check their task and repair their
   work

I will work on the other sections (benefits, techniques, etc.) as you
suggested.

Best,
Thaddeus


On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks
>
> the most important thing is that each success criteria is clear and
> testable. In other words different people in different organisations would
> understand it exactly the same way.
>
> Mary JO and Mike Gower  (from WCAG) have offered to help me clarify the
> wording of the success criteria.
>
> Does anyone feel the do not want us to rework/re check the wording from
> the success criteria they are working on?
>  If you do want us to go over it again, then work on the other sections
> (benefits, intent , techniques etc)   for now.
> Also please  send me any clarifications or suggestions for changes in the
> wording that you may have.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>