RE: volunteer information with extended information

Thank you!

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:35:22 +0300  Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote ---- 

    Hi Lisa,
  
 I just signed up for / added my name to: “Do not add mechanisms that are likely to confuse the user in a way that may do them harm and use known techniques to keep the user safe.”
  
  John
  
 John Rochford
 UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
 Director, INDEX Program
 Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
 www.DisabilityInfo.org
 Twitter: @ClearHelper
  
 Confidentiality Notice:
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.
 
  
   From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
 Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 AM
 To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
 Subject: volunteer information with extended information
 
 
  
     
 
   Hi Folks
 
    
 
   Please can you volunteer for putting success criteria into the WCAG template by signing up here:
 
  https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list
    
 
   Writing up according to the template: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria
 
    
 
    
 
   I made a sample at : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html (note this does not follow the template right now but has all the content - I will try to update it to the new template soon) 
 
    
 
   It is worth looking at wcag 2.O such as https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html to see the kind of wording used in WCAG.
 
    
 
   Comply with: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria
 
    
 
   Also, realy realy important , is we want to get these passed, to do this we realy want to:  
 
    
 
    show the benefits including any evidence and
 show test-ability
 make it clear
 
   you can see an example of a general test procedure here:https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests
 
    
 
   Some thing we might want to clarify s that people with cognitive disabilities include many types of disabilities such as
 
   people with 
 
    Language related disabilities
 Memory related disabilities
 Focus and attention related disabilities
 Executive and decision making disabilities
 
    
 
    What wording to start with?
   
  we have the SC proposal at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/index.html
   
  However we have split up some of them https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rewrodedsc2.html
   
  I suggested looking at the SC in the full proposal and seeing if it is redone in the rewording. If it is use the new wording, but use  the exceptions terms and techniques in the original proposal.  If needed I will merge them once the proposal  is approved by the group
   
   
 
  
  All the best
 
 Lisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter