RE: Privacy and Security Success Criteria Doc

Hi Lisa,

Your questions and my answers are below.


·      Lisa: Do you want me to look at anything?

o  John: No. I now fear I did everything wrong / wasted my time.

·      Lisa: Did you look at the main proposal at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/index.html#provide-a-clear-structure-that-includes ?

o  John: No, because that doc was not referenced in your message requesting volunteers for success criteria.

·      Lisa: Also I do not see you down for that SC but the one on avoid harming the user.

o  John: On the SC To Do List<https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list> to which you referred us, I added my name under “Do not add mechanisms that are likely to confuse the user in a way that may do them harm and use known techniques to keep the user safe” because I assumed that is: the privacy and security one; and the one you wanted me to address.

John

John Rochford<http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 7:17 AM
To: Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Privacy and Security Success Criteria Doc

Hi John

DO you want me to look at anything?

Also I do not see you down for that SC but the one on avoid harming the user. Did you look at the main proposal at https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/index.html#provide-a-clear-structure-that-includes




All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>



---- On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:17:00 +0300 Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>> wrote ----
Hi Lisa,

I have spent 6+ hours on the draft of the web security and privacy criteria.  I have much work to do, which I will continue this week.

John

John Rochford<http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 10:34 AM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>>
Subject: volenteer for success cryteria


Hi Folks

Please can you volunteer for putting success criteria into the WCAG template by signing up here:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list


Writing up according to the template: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria


(also attached as html page - if you need it in MS word let me know)

I made a sample at : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html (note this does not follow the template right now but has all the content - I will try to update it to the new template soon)

It is worth looking at wcag 2.O such as https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html to see the kind of wording used in WCAG.

Comply with: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria


Also, realy realy important , is we want to get these passed, to do this we realy want to:


  *   show the benefits including any evidence and
  *   show test-ability
  *   make it clear
you can see an example of a general test procedure here: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests


Some thing we might want to clarify s that people with cognitive disabilities include many types of disabilities such as
people with

  *   Language related disabilities
  *   Memory related disabilities
  *   Focus and attention related disabilities
  *   Executive and decision making disabilities



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>