- From: Debra Ruh Global <debra@ruhglobal.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:49:27 +0300
- To: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>, Jamie Knight <Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
- Message-Id: <7D52B139-C885-4D8A-9029-B6AA77144E70@ruhglobal.com>
+1 also Debra Ruh, Ruh Global CEO & AXSChat Co-Founder Global Accessibility & Disability Inclusion Strategist G3ict Employability Chair (804) 986-4500 Debra@RuhGlobal.com www.RuhGlobal.com Follow Me on twitter,linked-in, facebook,pinterest, tumblr, Google+ & SKYPE at debraruh "Uncovering Hidden Human Capital: How Leading Corporations Leverage Multiple Abilities in Their Workforce" will be published by G3ict on December 2, 2015 "Find Your Voice using Social Media" by Debra Ruh http://ow.ly/kxglR > On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:08 PM, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > I also agree. There are ARASAAC and SCLERA as Creative Commons symbol sets but very different in style and linguistic elements. > > Best wishes > E.A. > Sent from my mobile phone > > On 9 Oct 2015, at 13:56, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com<mailto:steve@opendirective.com>> wrote: > > > +1 > > Though Garry has passed straight-street pending much needed resources. > > Steve Lee > Sent from my mobile device Please excuse typing errors > > On 9 Oct 2015 12:33, "Jamie Knight" <Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk<mailto:Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk>> wrote: > Helo, > > +1 to: > > "I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will be widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to purchase something." > > IMHO We should work in the open via things like Straight Street and the noun project. > > Jamie + Lion > _______________________________________ > From: Rochford, John [john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>] > Sent: 09 October 2015 12:14 > To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf > Subject: RE: Two important drafts to review. > > Hi Lisa and All, > > > > There's a lot to like about the drafts. I think the explanations and the examples are good. Grammar issues will have to be resolved in the final version. > > > > I think we should be sure what we are proposing cannot be accomplished within ARIA's current capabilities. I believe this is in line w/ Rich's previous comments. > > > > I wonder if our proposal will be obviated by GPII, as Steve may be suggesting. > > > > I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will be widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to purchase something. > > > > "That means the end use (sic) could buy the symbols and use them across different devices or applications." > > John > > John Rochford<http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901> > UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center > Director, INDEX Program > Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health > www.DisabilityInfo.org<http://www.DisabilityInfo.org> > Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper> > [Facebook Button]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-England-INDEXShriver-CenterUMass-Medical-School/227064920160>[Twitter Button]<https://twitter.com/NEINDEX> [WordPress Logo] <http://www.disabilityinfo.org/blog/> > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>] > Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:27 PM > To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>> > Subject: Two important drafts to review. > > > > Hi Folks > > > > I pulled together the conclusions for this weeks call, and the other emails going back and forth, to make a new version of the adaptable links and buttons issue paper. I think it is now ready to be a proposal for WAI-ARIA extension for COGA. > > Please take a look and tell me what else it needs to be submitted as a first draft for ARIA to look at. > > see : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html > > > > When we have it all together it is easier to see if there are issues. So please review it carefully. > > > > I also pulled out of the draft of the gap analysis the content that is relevant for a WCAG extension. See https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG > > I think we should review it and then ask WCAG if this is in the right direction. > > > > Taking these two pieces out of the gap analysis may allow us more time to work on the other issue papers without delaying the dependent deadlines for WCAG or ARIA. > > > > > > All the best > > > > Lisa Seeman > > > > Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com> > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 06:50:07 UTC