+1
Best regards,
HA&AC Logo
Mary Jo Mueller
IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager, IBM Accessibility
Phone: 1-512-286-9698 | Tie-Line: 363-9698
E-mail: maryjom@us.ibm.com
HA&AC Able Website: w3.ibm.com/able
Follow the Human Ability and Accessibility Center on: and
within IBM on:
“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and
become more, you are a leader.” ~ John Quincy Adams
From: Debra Ruh Global <debra@ruhglobal.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Date: 07/30/2015 05:36 AM
Subject: Re: notation for access keys
Lisa, I think we should be consistent. So my vote would be yes. Thanks for
your leadership. Debra
Debra Ruh, Ruh Global Communications & AXSChat
Global Accessibility and Disability Inclusion Strategist
G3ict Employability & Technology Chair
(804) 986-4500
Debra@RuhGlobal.com
www.RuhGlobal.com
Follow Me on twitter,linked-in, facebook,pinterest, tumblr, Google+
And SKYPE at debraruh
Proud to announce my book “Find Your Voice using Social Media”
http://ow.ly/kxglR
My 2nd book "Uncovering Hidden Human Capital: How Leading Corporations
Leverage Multiple Abilities in Their Workforce" will be published in 2015.
On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:52 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
Hi Folks
Should our default representation for keyboard short cuts be
consistent with the following
http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-kbdshortcuts
(This is for the personalization notation in
see
https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html
and
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Easy_Personalization
)
All the best
Lisa Seeman
Athena ICT Accessibility Projects
LinkedIn, Twitter
