Re: A few thoughts on language.

I also agree with Jamie and we are using many terms in the U.S. However more and more we seem to be embracing Neurodiversity. I agree with Jamie and other comments - it embraces the person / social model as opposed to medical model. Debra

Debra Ruh, Ruh Global Communications & AXSChat 
Global Accessibility and Disability Inclusion Strategist 
G3ict Employability & Technology Chair
(804) 986-4500 
Debra@RuhGlobal.com
www.RuhGlobal.com

Follow Me on twitter,linked-in, facebook,pinterest, tumblr, Google+
And SKYPE at debraruh 

Proud to announce my book “Find Your Voice using Social Media” http://ow.ly/kxglR

My 2nd book "Uncovering Hidden Human Capital: How Leading Corporations Leverage Multiple Abilities in Their Workforce" will be published in 2015.








> On Jul 13, 2015, at 6:52 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jamie
> This is an important issue, that we have been struggling with. The problem is that so many of the alternative terms are used to mean different things in different locations. For example LD means something else entirely in the US and Europe.
> 
> Cognitive impairment is being used in a limiting way in the US - see http://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/cognitive_impairment/cogimp_poilicy_final.pdf
> 
> I love the term neurodiversity. The problem is a lot of people do not know what it means.
> 
> All the best
> 
> Lisa Seeman
> 
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
> LinkedIn, Twitter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:28:01 +0300 Jamie Knight<Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk> wrote ---- 
> Hello All, 
> 
> Hope everyone is well. I was wondering if it would be worth discussing how we use language. 
> 
> I see lots of references to 'cognitive disability'. I'm not sure that's the term we should be using. 
> 
> I have several impairments due to my autistic traits. I also have a number of abilities due to the same. 
> 
> However It's the environment that limits my ability to do things and thus my 'disability' is environmental. 
> 
> To use a physical metaphor. If someone in unable to walk (an impairment) and uses assistive technology (a wheelchair) and the environment is inclusive (lifts, ramps etc) then they are not disabled. The impairment becomes as relevant as their eye colour. 
> 
> In most of the issue papers I have seen we break down challenges by impairment. So perhaps we could adopt the term cognitive impairment. 
> 
> Additionally, for some the term is neurodiversity. ND respects someone for being different but also part of normal variation, it rejects the medicalisation of a set of common traits or reactions. 
> 
> I think It's a subtle but important change in language. 
> 
> I have impairments for sure. But that does not mean I should be disabled by the them. 
> 
> What do you think? 
> 
> Jamie + Lion 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------- 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk 
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and 
> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. 
> If you have received it in 
> error, please delete it from your system. 
> Do not use, copy or disclose the 
> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender 
> immediately. 
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails 
> sent or received. 
> Further communication will signify your consent to 
> this. 
> ----------------------------- 
> 
> 
>