- From: Neil Milliken <Neil.Milliken@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:58:45 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4D13F19E-AA48-4DC0-8047-D5BB136274F2@bbc.co.uk>
+1 to Rich & Steve I think RDFA will just add to confusion in the dev community. Sent from my iPad On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:24, "Steve Lee" <steve@opendirective.com<mailto:steve@opendirective.com>> wrote: +1 to Richard RDF is understood / popular in academic circles and of course TBL for the semantic web but I don't think anywhere else such as general web dev community. We dev is complex enough already - just see recent posts by PPK and Bruce Lawson :) https://dev.opera.com/blog/on-a-moratorium-on-new-browser-features/ Steve Lee OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 3 August 2015 at 17:22, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: My experience is that many people simply don't understand RDF. It was a tremendous hurdle getting people to adopt and understand ARIA. Introducing yet another technology would be a significant undertaking. Rich Schwerdtfeger <graycol.gif>"lisa.seeman" ---08/03/2015 09:50:15 AM---Liddies proposal was to use RDFa whereever possible inplace of an aria extentionThe simplese case wo From: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>> Date: 08/03/2015 09:50 AM Subject: ARIA or RDFA? ________________________________ Liddies proposal was to use RDFa whereever possible inplace of an aria extention The simplese case would look like <button type="button" property="http://scehma.org/coga/terms/save">default</button> in place of <button type="button" aria-function="undo" >default</button> There are many ways to write it such as <body vocab="http://scehma.org/coga/terms "> <button type="button" property="save">default</button> this might make it harder for simple user agents to parse and manipulate it. I also think in some cases it makes it more complex to use. I do not think everything will work as RDFa such as aria-importance or aria-numberfree, so we would still be doing an aria extension. I think we should look at the metadata and see if there is a more RDF compatible way to write it. However the linked data inline should be only for easyread alternatives. All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/> LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 21:59:19 UTC