W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > December 2014

RE: proposed edits to the user reaserch

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:32:30 +0000
To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <509e75e8dd484f46b8bb84ddd3e71fe4@DM2PR0201MB0720.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Whatever you decide here, can you also make sure that you footnote the first instance in the document for the purposes of the document review.  This topic is one of active discussion at the W3C so I’d just like to make sure that this is called out and can be explicitly considered during reviews.

From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:26 PM
To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf
Subject: RE: proposed edits to the user reaserch


From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:01 PM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf
Subject: proposed edits to the user reaserch

Hi Folks

I would like to remove the phrase "ICT" from the douments and change them to the Web, Web technologies, The Web of things,  Web systems or the like.

This is because ICT is sometimes out of scope , so it may raise a few questions if we publish a document with ICT in it, but, in our case, it realy is talking about the same technology.
Let me know in the next 48 hours if there is any objection. If not I will make the edits.
All the best

Lisa Seeman

Athena ICT Accessibility Projects<http://accessibility.athena-ict.com>
LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 20:33:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:23 UTC