Re: My paper on applying agentic AI to business workflows

That sounds like it deserves another paper to cover the required details. W3C’s work on Verifiable Credentials and Decentralised Identifiers sounds relevant.  The IETF is actively discussing agent to agent standards.

> On 25 Feb 2026, at 07:17, 陳信屹 <tyson@slashlife.ai> wrote:
> 
> Your tiered architecture addresses semantic orchestration within an enterprise boundary.
> 
> Have you considered how reasoning traces, delegation intent, and service invocation semantics would operate across institutional boundaries where agent identity and authority need to be verifiable?
> 
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> 於 2026年2月24日週二 下午8:20寫道：
>> 
>> You may be interested in a preprint of my perspective paper on applying agentic AI to business workflows:
>> 
>> <cogai.png>
>> cogai/papers/AI4OfficeWork.pdf at master · w3c/cogai
>> github.com
>>  <https://github.com/w3c/cogai/blob/master/papers/AI4OfficeWork.pdf>cogai/papers/AI4OfficeWork.pdf at master · w3c/cogai <https://github.com/w3c/cogai/blob/master/papers/AI4OfficeWork.pdf>
>> github.com <https://github.com/w3c/cogai/blob/master/papers/AI4OfficeWork.pdf>
>> 
>> The approach exploits the strength of LLMs for reasoning with the open texture of language in combination with symbolic approaches for efficient deterministic processing. It shows how Agentic AI can be used for semantic orchestration across a swarm of specialised agents, along with delegating difficult or high risk cases to human staff, who can enrich the business rules and precedents used by the agents.  The approach uses audit trails as a basis for human oversight.  Agents are required to cite which rules were used along with supporting quoted extracts. These lower the risk of hallucinations, and can be checked automatically.
>> 
>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
>> 
>> 
>> 

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>