- From: Matteo Bianchetti <mttbnchtt@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:02:29 -0500
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-cogai <public-cogai@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKPPfxPwS0a5zpauvm8SYNgvpyUpHToHDsHAxCHe9n+Zk4WnQg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks very much, Dave. I will read the SEP entry and think about the connections with Walton and AIF. We can discuss how I can be useful on this matter. All the best, Matteo On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:03, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > Good question. I was relying on summaries of his work. You could look at: > > https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/ > > In summary, Aristotle and his peers advocate building arguments around: > > *Ethos*: establishing credibility to engender trust > *Pathos*: using emotion to stir people’s feelings > *Logos*: using logic to emphasise rational support > *Kairos*: opportune, i.e. timely and topical in nature > > > Walton and others discuss the ideas of argumentation schemes, e.g. > establishing credibility by providing evidence that you or a person you > cite is an expert with relevant experience. > > On 9 Jan 2024, at 15:56, Matteo Bianchetti <mttbnchtt@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > In your previous email, you said to explore rhetorical guidelines from > Aristotle. You did not provide a reference. The most obvious reference is > Aristotle's Rethoric but other works may be relevant as well. Which book, > if any, of Aristotle did you have in mind? > > Thanks very much, > Matteo > > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2024 20:02:47 UTC