Re: GPT Builder - portability / import/export

Hi Tim,

There is a lot of work around the current architecture for LLMs, e.g. fine tuning, use of retrieval augmented generation, etc. and de facto standards are likely to emerge naturally as a result of the dominant roles of the big players, and also through re-use of open source libraries. 

I am more interested in novel architectures that can integrate episodic and encyclopaedic memory, along with explicit handling of Type 1 & 2 processing:

Type 1 processing is fast, automatic, and opaque, e.g. recognising a cat in a photograph or a traffic sign when driving a car.

Type 2 processing is slow, deliberative, and open to introspection, e.g. mental arithmetic. It  is formed by chaining Type 1 processes using working memory. 

Kind regards,
     Dave

> On 25 Nov 2023, at 03:04, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> There's a few 'Create a GPT'  options appearing,
> 
> https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8554397-creating-a-gpt
> 
> https://powervirtualagents.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-power-virtual-agents-now-part-of-microsoft-copilot-studio/ 
> 
> I haven't tried the microsoft one (not sure if i have access) but have had a bit of a look at the OpenAI one - it says, i can upload a file to provide it additional knowledge, but i don't have a clear idea of the specifications that relate to what files i could upload.
> 
> I think you are far more interested in these Large Learning Model platform GPTs, etc...  I was thinking of a specification for a file that could enable portability, import/export, a bit like 'data portability' but more GPT portability or an ability to have a file that defines a set of characteristics that then - kinda work, in models that support that recommendation / standard...  
> 
> IE: a 'solid bot' or a 'credentials bot' or indeed, a bot that is uploaded with different 'packages'... 
> 
> ie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrzgxUhnYjY 
> 
> FWIW: plan has been to do something similar for HumanCentricAI agents; but, the operation would be local, not via these platform focused alternatives....  
> 
> SO, I thought you might be interested in having a think about it via CogAI?
> 
> 
> 
> Tim.H. (TCH)

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>