- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:21:38 +0100
- To: Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>
- Cc: public-cogai <public-cogai@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <997F351D-23A3-4BB2-93D0-FE748BEFF1D9@w3.org>
Hi Ronald, Thanks to your feedback, I’ve added informative sections on how to use chunks to describe chunk data models, along with the scripting API from the JavaScript implementation. https://w3c.github.io/cogai/chunks-and-rules.html#data-models Best regards, Dave > On 25 Jun 2023, at 10:49, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > > > >> On 24 Jun 2023, at 18:20, Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com <mailto:rreck@rrecktek.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> While reading the document [1] I had these questions. >> >> In the first diagram what is signified by one buffer being a different colors that the others? > > The brown buffer provides access to the module with the chunk rules. This can be used to inspect and update rules. This allows you to create a rule set that can update other rules, e.g. as a means to model procedural learning. I need to add some information on this to the chunks & rules spec. I have added issue #49 to keep track of this. > > A rule is a chunk with the properties @condition and @action. The property values are the list of chunks for the conditions and actions respectively. There is a suite of @do actions that can be used to manipulate and update chunks. A rule could have an action with an @compile property whose value is the chunk ID for a rule to be compiled to the rule module. The same action could have an @map property to reference one or more @map chunks as explained above. > >> how would the chunk for fido differ if he were 4 months old instead of 4 years? > > The example assumes the age property is in years. That was an arbitrary choice. If you wanted to, you could add a property for the units to that chunk, or you could do so indirectly via annotating “dog” as a type. In either case, the meaning is in how the chunks are used, as there is no built-in meaning. The property name “age” for instance, means something to us as an English word, but has no intrinsic meaning to a chunk rule. > >> >> to me, I can imagine wanting to create a grounding scope of time >> and place concerning my belief about Mary's desire. maybe this is >> addressed elsewhere (like a condition). >> >> are all @kindof also isa? >> >> values of properties have an order? >> >> >> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:42:10 +0100, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Inspired by Francois Daoust’s specification for chunks and rules [1], I’ve recently started to draft a similar specification for the plausible knowledge notation (PKN), see [2]. Aany comments and suggestions will be much appreciated. A formal specification is a good way to be sure of the details and to encourage . At some point the Cognitive AI Community Group can decide to transition these reports from draft to final reports. The process is governed by [3] and quoted below: >>> >>>> Community Group Reports are either “Draft” or “Final.” When a group announces a Final Report that is a Specification, the group asks participants to make patent licensing commitments under the W3C Community Final Specification Agreement. These commitments help to ensure that the Specification may be implemented by anyone without payment of royalties. >>>> >>>> Note: Community and Business Group Reports are not W3C standards or on the W3C standards track. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/ >>> [2] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/pkn.html >>> [3] https://www.w3.org/community/reports/ >>> >>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> >> >> >> Ronald P. Reck >> >> http://www.rrecktek.com - http://www.ronaldreck.com >> > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2023 18:54:38 UTC