Re: Drafting spec for plausible knowledge notation for a CG Report

Hi Dave,

While reading the document [1] I had these questions.

In the first diagram what is signified by one buffer being a different colors that the others?

how would the chunk for fido differ if he were 4 months old instead of 4 years?

to me, I can imagine wanting to create a grounding scope of time
and place concerning my belief about Mary's desire. maybe this is
addressed elsewhere (like a condition).

are all @kindof also isa?

values of properties have an order?


On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:42:10 +0100, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> Inspired by Francois Daoust’s specification for chunks and rules [1], I’ve recently started to draft a similar specification for the plausible knowledge notation (PKN), see [2].  Aany comments and suggestions will be much appreciated. A formal specification is a good way to be sure of the details and to encourage . At some point the Cognitive AI Community Group can decide to transition these reports from draft to final reports.  The process is governed by [3] and quoted below:
> 
> > Community Group Reports are either “Draft” or “Final.” When a group announces a Final Report that is a Specification, the group asks participants to make patent licensing commitments under the W3C Community Final Specification Agreement. These commitments help to ensure that the Specification may be implemented by anyone without payment of royalties.
> > 
> > Note: Community and Business Group Reports are not W3C standards or on the W3C standards track.
> 
> 
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/
> [2] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/pkn.html
> [3] https://www.w3.org/community/reports/
> 
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>


Ronald P. Reck

http://www.rrecktek.com - http://www.ronaldreck.com

Received on Saturday, 24 June 2023 17:20:23 UTC