Re: Scheduling a presentation + discussion on plausible reasoning

Hello everyone,

Mr. Ragget, sorry, by my side, for not attending the call.
I was, and I'm still am, very interested in participating to this very
community, but, at this specific time I was attending an employer meeting.

I'm looking forward to carefully read the material and contribute with the
best I can.

best wishes,

Em qui., 22 de set. de 2022 às 12:31, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I am only at my computer at this hour to send some urgent health
> recommendation- and also because we are having quakes that keep me alert.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:21 PM Timothy Holborn <
> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It started at midnight for me here...
>>
>> I spent quite a few years living during the night to do international /
>> W3C stuff..
>>
>> Today I started at 7:30am, so, exhausted by midnight. Apologies.
>>
>> I look forward to reviewing the video.
>>
>> Tim.h
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Sept 2022, 12:35 am Dave Raggett, <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, this didn’t seem like an effective time slot to have chosen, as
>>> there was only myself and François Daoust on the call.  I am happy to try
>>> again if this time we can get clear commitments to attend.  A call first
>>> thing in morning in Europe should be reasonable for folks in the
>>> Asia-Pacific timezone. Meanwhile, please take a look at the slides and the
>>> plausible reasoning demo (links below), and let us know what you think.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On 18 Sep 2022, at 10:34, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Based on the poll results, it looks like Thursday at 15:00-16:00 UK time
>>> is the best we can do. I will work with my colleagues to allocate the call
>>> and send out a meeting invite with the link.  I am happy to arrange another
>>> slot for a second call at a time more convenient for people in Asia-Pacific
>>> time zones.
>>>
>>> On 1 Sep 2022, at 09:16, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> It has been a long time since our last teleconference for the Cognitive
>>> AI Community Group, and I would like to schedule a teleconference to
>>> present the work I have been busy on in respect to plausible reasoning,
>>> including a demo [1], and to invite discussion on the conjecture that
>>> plausible reasoning and human-like AI will eventually replace the semantic
>>> web.
>>>
>>> This follows on from the workshop on imperfect knowledge [2] that I
>>> co-chaired with William Van Woensel earlier this year as part of the
>>> Knowledge Graph conference (KGC-2022).  I am now looking forward to
>>> presenting the work on 12th September at the upcoming workshop on
>>> analogies: from theory to practice as part of the International Conference
>>> on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) [3].
>>>
>>> In essence, plausible reasoning deals with imperfect knowledge, and
>>> mimics human argumentation for and against a premise in question. The
>>> plausible knowledge notation (PKN) is a proposed format that blends
>>> symbolic graphs with qualitative metadata in lieu of detailed statistics.
>>> The demo presents a variety of examples including reasoning with analogies.
>>> I am currently extending it to further support fuzzy quantifiers such as
>>> few, many and most. Plausible reasoning subsumes fuzzy logic and
>>> qualitative reasoning.
>>>
>>> I am hoping to arrange the teleconference sometime in the week starting
>>> Monday, 19th September. Please email me directly to indicate which days and
>>> times (including timezone) are good for you, and I will then create a
>>> doodle poll to select the best slot.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/reasoning/
>>> [2]
>>> https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/kgc-2022-workshop-representing-and-reasoning-with-imperfect-knowledge/
>>>
>>> [3] https://iccbr2022.loria.fr/analogies/
>>>
>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
Gabriel Lopes
*Interoperability as Jam's sessions!*
*Each system emanating the music that crosses itself, instrumentalizing
scores and ranges...*
*... of Resonance, vibrations, information, data, symbols, ..., Notes.*

*How interoperable are we with the Music the World continuously offers to
our senses?*
*Maybe it depends on our foundations...?*