Re: Scheduling a presentation + discussion on plausible reasoning

Dave
sorry the call was not well attended
I have taken a look at the slides - they are great and
the demo is full of very interesting stuff, so much work has gone into it
It is also relevant to AI KR -
I also appreciate your effort to make participation possible for us in AP
timezone

I have some general considerations I may be able to share, which I hope you
would consider relevant to this work. I would participate in a panel, like
a roundtable on the topic
and would prepare a few slides with the point I want to raise in
connection to your slides and demo
If the round table/panel discussion could be recorded, we could consider
this
a webinar

Evening time in AP timezone tends to be compatible with mornings in the US
and lunchtime in EU
pdm

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:35 PM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> Hmm, this didn’t seem like an effective time slot to have chosen, as there
> was only myself and François Daoust on the call.  I am happy to try again
> if this time we can get clear commitments to attend.  A call first thing in
> morning in Europe should be reasonable for folks in the Asia-Pacific
> timezone. Meanwhile, please take a look at the slides and the plausible
> reasoning demo (links below), and let us know what you think.
>
> Best regards,
> Dave
>
> On 18 Sep 2022, at 10:34, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Based on the poll results, it looks like Thursday at 15:00-16:00 UK time
> is the best we can do. I will work with my colleagues to allocate the call
> and send out a meeting invite with the link.  I am happy to arrange another
> slot for a second call at a time more convenient for people in Asia-Pacific
> time zones.
>
> On 1 Sep 2022, at 09:16, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>
> It has been a long time since our last teleconference for the Cognitive AI
> Community Group, and I would like to schedule a teleconference to present
> the work I have been busy on in respect to plausible reasoning, including a
> demo [1], and to invite discussion on the conjecture that plausible
> reasoning and human-like AI will eventually replace the semantic web.
>
> This follows on from the workshop on imperfect knowledge [2] that I
> co-chaired with William Van Woensel earlier this year as part of the
> Knowledge Graph conference (KGC-2022).  I am now looking forward to
> presenting the work on 12th September at the upcoming workshop on
> analogies: from theory to practice as part of the International Conference
> on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) [3].
>
> In essence, plausible reasoning deals with imperfect knowledge, and mimics
> human argumentation for and against a premise in question. The plausible
> knowledge notation (PKN) is a proposed format that blends symbolic graphs
> with qualitative metadata in lieu of detailed statistics.  The demo
> presents a variety of examples including reasoning with analogies. I am
> currently extending it to further support fuzzy quantifiers such as few,
> many and most. Plausible reasoning subsumes fuzzy logic and qualitative
> reasoning.
>
> I am hoping to arrange the teleconference sometime in the week starting
> Monday, 19th September. Please email me directly to indicate which days and
> times (including timezone) are good for you, and I will then create a
> doodle poll to select the best slot.
>
> Best regards,
> Dave
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/reasoning/
> [2]
> https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/kgc-2022-workshop-representing-and-reasoning-with-imperfect-knowledge/
>
> [3] https://iccbr2022.loria.fr/analogies/
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>