Re: Scheduling a presentation + discussion on plausible reasoning

I am looking forward to seeing this. I wonder if we (royal) can record it?

On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:52:26 +0100, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> Thanks for your responses, with people spread across the world, it doesn’t look like there is a single best time slot.  I am therefore thinking about arranging two teleconferences, one in the UK’s afternoon that would suit Europe and North America, and another that would be better for folks who can’t make that.
> 
> How about 15:00 UK time on Wednesday 21st September for the first call?
> 
> Bandon and Paola, can you suggest a slot that would better suit the two of you?
> 
> Best regards,
> Dave
> 
> > On 5 Sep 2022, at 15:54, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
> > 
> > A gentle reminder to let me know of your interest ...
> > 
> > The slides for the ATA workshop are now available at:
> > 
> >  https://www.w3.org/2022/09/ATA-Raggett-2022-09-12.pdf <https://www.w3.org/2022/09/ATA-Raggett-2022-09-12.pdf> 
> > 
> > p.s. the demo now includes examples of using fuzzy quantifiers as I successfully implemented them as part of the plausible reasoning library module.
> > 
> >> On 1 Sep 2022, at 09:16, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> wrote:
> >> 
> >> It has been a long time since our last teleconference for the Cognitive AI Community Group, and I would like to schedule a teleconference to present the work I have been busy on in respect to plausible reasoning, including a demo [1], and to invite discussion on the conjecture that plausible reasoning and human-like AI will eventually replace the semantic web.
> >> 
> >> This follows on from the workshop on imperfect knowledge [2] that I co-chaired with William Van Woensel earlier this year as part of the Knowledge Graph conference (KGC-2022).  I am now looking forward to presenting the work on 12th September at the upcoming workshop on analogies: from theory to practice as part of the International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) [3].
> >> 
> >> In essence, plausible reasoning deals with imperfect knowledge, and mimics human argumentation for and against a premise in question. The plausible knowledge notation (PKN) is a proposed format that blends symbolic graphs with qualitative metadata in lieu of detailed statistics.  The demo presents a variety of examples including reasoning with analogies. I am currently extending it to further support fuzzy quantifiers such as few, many and most. Plausible reasoning subsumes fuzzy logic and qualitative reasoning.
> >> 
> >> I am hoping to arrange the teleconference sometime in the week starting Monday, 19th September. Please email me directly to indicate which days and times (including timezone) are good for you, and I will then create a doodle poll to select the best slot.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Dave
> >> 
> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/reasoning/ <https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/reasoning/> 
> >> [2] https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/kgc-2022-workshop-representing-and-reasoning-with-imperfect-knowledge/ <https://www.knowledgegraph.tech/kgc-2022-workshop-representing-and-reasoning-with-imperfect-knowledge/> 
> >> [3] https://iccbr2022.loria.fr/analogies/ <https://iccbr2022.loria.fr/analogies/> 
> >> 
> >> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2022 18:04:52 UTC