RE: Adopting chunks graph data and rules as a Draft CG Report

Hi Dave,

Few comments.

(1) I wasn't sure how to visualise 'modules' in related to Figure 1. In your figure 1, are modules represented in blue colour?

(2) In Section 4.1 you talk about a special case. Is it possible to give example? (I could imagine how it looks like based on the information you provided, but I felt it would be better if you provide just in case if we misinterpret).

(3) In Section 4.2, you mentioned that identify is optional. Is it possible to give an example to show how it looks like?

(4) I got a bit confused by the use of the term 'KindOf'. what would be the difference between (Type, Type of or Is-a) Vs 'KindOf'. As a non-native to English speaker, I initially interpreted 'KindOf' as '...used when you are trying to explain or describe something, but you cannot be exact...' (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/kind-of).

I wasn't sure whether you are trying to use 'KindOf' as an alternative to 'Is-a' or do you expect 'KindOf' to be able to handle ambiguity (some sort of probability)

(5) You have identified 'goal module' as a special module which will be created by the rule engine. Based on your diagram (Figure 1) I assume there will be 1 goals module and 1 rules module. Is this correct? Is there anything special about 'rules module'? Will 'rules module' get created automatically (similar to 'goal module')? Is it correct to assume long term memory (local and remote) are 'facts modules'?

Cheers,
Charith

From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Sent: 19 October 2020 02:44 PM
To: public-cogai <public-cogai@w3.org>
Subject: Adopting chunks graph data and rules as a Draft CG Report

On behalf of the chairs of the Cognitive AI Community Group, I would like to ask the Community Group for approval for formally adopting the chunks graph data and rules specification [1] as a Draft CG Report. If you have any objections, please email this list before next Monday (26 November 2020).

We also very much welcome review of the draft specification and expect to iterate it further before calling for formal approval for releasing it as an official CG Report.

[1] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fcogai%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cpererac%40cardiff.ac.uk%7C44c4ed441a99412d9a7608d874351349%7Cbdb74b3095684856bdbf06759778fcbc%7C1%7C0%7C637387118592885237%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=NoRhlZKuBVFaY6BCS5Q2LPMkNa%2BmwPmshQZdrk5aCZs%3D&reserved=0>

Many thanks,

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2FRaggett&data=04%7C01%7Cpererac%40cardiff.ac.uk%7C44c4ed441a99412d9a7608d874351349%7Cbdb74b3095684856bdbf06759778fcbc%7C1%7C0%7C637387118592895184%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=R%2FXO7L%2BvVOrIHeiPzw7rDTHX2iQBveGPSGd2btcuhFQ%3D&reserved=0>
W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things