- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:28:59 +0000
- To: public-clreq-admin@w3.org
On 04/02/2020 11:25, r12a wrote: > We are experimenting with a new approach for creating content for the > gap-analysis work. Fuqiao asked me to convert the clreq gap-analysis doc > too. I've now created the new document and issues to cover the points that were already there. However, i removed or changed content related to quotations that was out of date. (There's no proper diff for those changes, but i don't think that's an issue.) I also didn't assign priorities for sections that had no descriptive text. So, from now on, if we want to change the content of the gap-analysis doc, it's a question of raising a new issue (if it's a new topic), or editing (or proposing edits for) an existing issue.* ri * If we decide that a topic is no longer relevant, we can simply close the issue and it will instantly disappear from the document.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 13:29:03 UTC