- From: Russell Potter <russell.potter3@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:56:16 +1100
- To: public-cloud@w3.org
I'm working on an idea in which a "client" (a process requiring some cloud computation) "engages" (uses) a cloud service by sending a multi-cast message to "224,0.0.1" (the reserved "all routers" address), indicating a requirement for work, I;m thinking the client would then wait for some appropriate time-out period to elapse (the delay sho- uldn't be too costly since this is a one-off initialisation step) for resp- onses from waiting cloud services, which would each consist of an ont- ology of the service's charging regime. The client would then choose the most appropriate service to "engage" (from amongst those responding) , based on its needs the client could,itself,be a cloud ser- vice, in which case the service being engaged would be a sub-cloud per- forming some sub-set of the cloud processing My questions are:would this process requiring a cloud service responding to each client's initial request for work with an ontology over-tax the service? (although I suppose this would depend on the size of the ontology, and the resp- onse load could always be spread across multiple machines ... ) and, since I'm not very conversant with multi-casting, is the coding for sending of a multi-cast network message the same as with sending a "normal" message, but to the "special" multi-cast address ? And. since multi-casting is relatively new, is it implemented commonly enough that its requirement for this idea to narrow its up=take too much? Russell
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 03:56:45 UTC