- From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:05:06 +0800
- To: "Siegman, Tzviya" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Cc: matt.garrish@gmail.com, 'Leonard Rosenthol' <lrosenth@adobe.com>, 'Lars Wallin' <lars@colibrio.com>, 'Zheng Xu' <zhengxu7806@gmail.com>, 'W3C Publishing Community Group' <public-publishingcg@w3.org>, public-chinese-web@w3.org
Hi Tzviya, Because most of the work has been transferred to the MiniApps WG (https://github.com/w3c/miniapp), I think we can discuss it in https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-packaging/issues. English discussions are of course welcome (most of our meetings and documents are in English). Here are some related discussions and documents, which you may find useful: https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-packaging/issues/7#issuecomment-792125210 ~xfq On 2021-03-09 22:44, Siegman, Tzviya wrote: > Would you like to raise this with the Chinese Web IG > (https://www.w3.org/2018/chinese-web-ig/), or do you need more time to > think it through? I would need Zheng’s help, since I don’t speak > Chinese. > > Tzviya Siegman > > Information Standards Principal > > Wiley > > 201-748-6884 > > tsiegman@wiley.com > > From: matt.garrish@gmail.com <matt.garrish@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 9:41 AM > To: 'Leonard Rosenthol' <lrosenth@adobe.com>; 'Lars Wallin' > <lars@colibrio.com>; 'Zheng Xu' <zhengxu7806@gmail.com> > Cc: 'W3C Publishing Community Group' <public-publishingcg@w3.org>; > public-chinese-web@w3.org > Subject: RE: Epub package for MiniApp? > > ⛔ > > This is an external email. > >> I believe that OCF started life at Adobe and was provided to the > IDPF for use in EPUB and was also licensed back to Adobe, where we > continue to use a variant of it called UCF > > Ah, okay, I’ll defer to your knowledge of those particulars! > > My understanding was mostly derived from moving 2.0.1 to 3.0 where the > only mentions are of building on and being backward compatible with > ODF. > > Matt > > From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > Sent: March 9, 2021 9:58 AM > To: matt.garrish@gmail.com; 'Lars Wallin' <lars@colibrio.com>; 'Zheng > Xu' <zhengxu7806@gmail.com> > Cc: 'W3C Publishing Community Group' <public-publishingcg@w3.org>; > public-chinese-web@w3.org > Subject: Re: Epub package for MiniApp? > > My understanding of the history here is quite different, Matt. > > I believe that OCF started life at Adobe and was provided to the IDPF > for use in EPUB and was also licensed back to Adobe, where we continue > to use a variant of it called UCF (Universal Container Format) to > package up all sorts of things… > > However, I do agree with you that OCF has been refocused to be EPUB > specific and should remain such. There are many other ZIP-based open > standard package formats to choose from if someone needs one. > > Leonard > > From: "matt.garrish@gmail.com" <matt.garrish@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 8:34 AM > To: 'Lars Wallin' <lars@colibrio.com>, 'Zheng Xu' > <zhengxu7806@gmail.com> > Cc: 'W3C Publishing Community Group' <public-publishingcg@w3.org>, > "public-chinese-web@w3.org" <public-chinese-web@w3.org> > Subject: RE: Epub package for MiniApp? > Resent-From: <public-publishingcg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 8:33 AM > > … someone will correct me if I'm wrong 😉 > > Okay, I’ll take the bait… > > OCF was not a separate format that was adapted for EPUB, but an > implementation for EPUB based on ODF’s packaging that was designed > to also be usable for other formats (primarily as a future replacement > for ODF). > > The idea of it being a generic container was scrapped with 3.0, > though, as it never panned out and it was a source of confusion about > why other formats could be bundled together in an epub publication. > > So as of the 3.0 revision, OCF requires a reference to an EPUB package > document in the container file, and subsequently was tightened even > further to only referencing package documents. > > You could use OCF 2.0.1, of course, as it doesn’t require a specific > content type, but even beside its age it might be confusingly > publication-centric for an app spec. What they’ve defined looks not > that dissimilar from LPF [5], except that again is bound to > publications. > > Matt > > From: Lars Wallin <lars@colibrio.com> > Sent: March 7, 2021 3:47 AM > To: Zheng Xu <zhengxu7806@gmail.com> > Cc: W3C Publishing Community Group <public-publishingcg@w3.org>; > public-chinese-web@w3.org > Subject: Re: Epub package for MiniApp? > > Hi Zheng 👋 > > The EPUB OCF is really a straight implementation of the Open Container > Format, which was designed an a generic container format. I think it > was a pre-existing format, someone will correct me if I'm wrong 😉 > > Anyway, what I mean to say is that the OCF should work fine for many > types of content. > > I need to do some reading on the MiniApp concept 🙂 > > Ciao 👋 > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, 18:08 Zheng Xu, <zhengxu7806@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Reading this spec >> https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/#constructor [1] I can >> not help >> wondering if MiniApp could adopt Epub as container since we are both >> >> zipped packages. >> >> I filed an issue for now >> https://github.com/w3c/mini-app-white-paper/issues/2 [2] just for >> record. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Zheng Xu >> >> W3C: https://www.w3.org/users/129468 [3] >> Github: https://github.com/Jeffxz [4] > > > Links: > ------ > [1] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fmini-app-white-paper%2F%23constructor&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C975134e4ab9440e41dbe08d8e2ffff6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637508936424645792%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=H%2FYYj6MyLoYeGRbKMu%2FlDy5fGD0XlF8S5t5rRsk2oDY%3D&reserved=0 > [2] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fmini-app-white-paper%2Fissues%2F2&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C975134e4ab9440e41dbe08d8e2ffff6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637508936424645792%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=OdUiPDCsw%2BkhZQtUzDGDBaXPbOSvHoPAbh0jeMGpvnQ%3D&reserved=0 > [3] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fusers%2F129468&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C975134e4ab9440e41dbe08d8e2ffff6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637508936424655751%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dj4c94TvnR8of63Zho08zBLUw1SsKR60YN7c06gjqGs%3D&reserved=0 > [4] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJeffxz&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C975134e4ab9440e41dbe08d8e2ffff6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637508936424864834%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SeNmV1Z18x5s2PPE7e4h2fp2LNzjbcvdQxI%2FZUcZjxs%3D&reserved=0 > [5] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Flpf%2F&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C975134e4ab9440e41dbe08d8e2ffff6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637508936424635838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VQs5Y8XizkedcKg3ifEz7fDd%2F0PQuvENO%2B4l8NbOpmw%3D&reserved=0
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 01:05:12 UTC