public-change@w3.org from September 2014 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2014

• RE: Before-Looks or After-Looks Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Innovimax W3C
• Re: Before-Looks or After-Looks Innovimax W3C

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

• Before-Looks or After-Looks Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Innovimax W3C
• Re: Technologies Innovimax W3C
• RE: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Robin LaFontaine
• Re: Technologies Robin LaFontaine
• Re: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Robin LaFontaine

Sunday, 21 September 2014

• RE: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - RDF Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - XForms Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: Technologies alain.couthures@agencexml.com
• Re: Related Initiatives [was RE: State of the Art (was: Starting work)] Innovimax W3C
• Re: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Innovimax W3C
• Re: Change Tracking Prolog Description Innovimax W3C
• Re: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Innovimax W3C
• Re: Technologies - RDF Innovimax W3C
• Re: Technologies Innovimax SARL

Saturday, 20 September 2014

• RE: Technologies - RDF Dennis E. Hamilton

Sunday, 21 September 2014

• Re: Technologies alain.couthures@agencexml.com
• Re: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Innovimax W3C
• RE: Technologies - RDF Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Dennis E. Hamilton
• Is abstraction to simple logical units a naive assumption? Dennis E. Hamilton
• ODF Repaired Change Tracking, Protected Change Tracking, and Blue Sky Office Dennis E. Hamilton

Saturday, 20 September 2014

• DChanges: Comparability of Higher-Level Documents Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - RDF Dennis E. Hamilton
• DChanges: The Challenge of Identifier Immutability Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: XML Change Tracking Standard Owen Ambur
• Integrated versus Injected Change-Tracking (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Dennis E. Hamilton
• Related Initiatives [was RE: State of the Art (was: Starting work)] Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Change Tracking Prolog Description Dennis E. Hamilton
• [OFF-TOPIC] FW: IMPORTANT: your message to public-change Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - Dublin Core Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: Technologies - Dublin Core Innovimax W3C
• Re: Technologies Innovimax SARL
• Re: Technologies - Accessibility, Security, Internationalization Innovimax W3C
• Re: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Innovimax W3C
• Re: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Innovimax W3C
• Re: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Innovimax W3C
• Re: Change Tracking Prolog Description Innovimax W3C
• RE: Change Tracking Prolog Description Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - Accessibility, Security, Internationalization Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Technologies - Dublin Core Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Dennis E. Hamilton
• Paper on complexity of Diff and comparison of various algorithms Innovimax SARL
• Re: Technologies alain.couthures@agencexml.com
• Change Tracking Prolog Description Innovimax SARL
• Technologies Innovimax SARL
• Re: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Innovimax W3C
• Re: External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Innovimax W3C
• Re: W3C change: Balisage conference paper on change tracking Innovimax W3C
• Re: Call for Papers - DChanges 2014: ACM DocEng Workshop on (Document) Changes: modeling, detection, storage and visualization Innovimax W3C
• Re: XML Change Tracking Standard Innovimax W3C
• Re: Next steps? Innovimax W3C
• Re: Relationship with other groups (was Re: Eating our own dog food (Was: Generic Change Tracking draft spec)) Innovimax W3C
• Use cases and requirements Innovimax SARL
• Re: State of the Art (was: Starting work) Innovimax SARL
• Keeping track of events Innovimax SARL
• Silence and back Innovimax SARL

Thursday, 18 September 2014

• RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Dennis E. Hamilton

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

• Fwd: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Claudius Teodorescu

Thursday, 4 September 2014

• External vs Internal situation of Changes (was RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion) Dennis E. Hamilton
• RE: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Dennis E. Hamilton
• Re: Change tracking processing instructions and deletion Robin LaFontaine

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 17:53:12 UTC