- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:31:15 -0500
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Timur Mehrvarz" <timur.mehrvarz@web.de>, public-cdf@w3.org, "Eric Seidel" <eric@webkit.org>
On 1/3/08, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:35:21 +0100, Timur Mehrvarz <timur.mehrvarz@web.de> > wrote: > > I'm forwarding this message I received from Eric Seidel a few days back. > > Their decision makes me a uncomfortable. People can use xml:id in their > > XHTML+SVG content and be compliant with one browser, currently. Or they > > can use id without xml: and be compliant with 3 browsers. But not with > > the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec. Or am I missing something? > > I very much concur with the WebKit team that SVG should not replace id="", > which already works, with xml:id="". (Despite the fact that we implemented > xml:id support of some sorts.) +1 Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 23:31:21 UTC