- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:28:25 +0100
- To: sspeiche@us.ibm.com
- Cc: ron.ausbrooks@mackichan.com, member-math@w3.org, public-cdf@w3.org
Steve > To be more specific on how this is being tracked: > > Since this was originally marked as a disagree from the first LC and then > it was reraised during our second LC, we are not tracking it as 2 > disagrees. Only the one [1] against the first LC for comments. As a personal response, I don't think that this is sufficiently clear logging of the status. The current situation makes it look as if the original comment which was essentially re-raised has now been agreed to be non-applicable which certainly is NOT the case. Marking it as "disagree" would be clearest, or as an absolute minimum marking it as duplicate of the earlier comment would be just about acceptable. Either way it should be coloured red not green in the last call document disposition of comments document. Being a duplicate comment (which it wasn't, exactly) is not the same as being "not applicable". David
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 21:28:41 UTC