- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:08:02 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, public-cdf@w3.org, tor@acm.org, "Jonathan Watt" <jwatt@jwatt.org>, <longsonr@gmail.com>
On Thursday, March 29, 2007, 8:38:50 PM, Anne wrote: AvK> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:35:33 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> Anne, what would you expect for the inverse case: >> >> <svg xml:base="whatever"> >> <foreignObject> >> <html><head><title>xml:base test</title></head> >> <body><p> >> <a href="relative-URI">test</a> >> </p></body></html> >> </foreignObject> >> </svg> >> >> would the html:a pick up the xml:base from the surrounding context? AvK> Definitely (assuming the correct namespace declarations). I was going to type those in but figured people would understand the example without, as the earlier example was also lacking them and I had a telcon coming up. AvK> In HTML5 AvK> <html:a> is defined in terms of xml:base / baseURI. target="" however is AvK> defined in terms of <html:base target=""> and <html:a target="">. So html:target is defined to ignore xml:base? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 19:08:04 UTC