- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:45:08 -0600
- To: www-svg@w3.org, public-cdf@w3.org
I have a question about XHTML+SVG when it comes to laying out SVG in a HTML:table. Here's my minimal test case. I'm also going to point this question at the svg-developers list too: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" > <style type="text/css">* { border-style:solid }</style> <body> <table border="1"> <tr> <td> <p>Paragraph One</p> <p>Paragraph Two</p> <p>Paragraph Three</p> <p>Paragraph Four</p> <p>Paragraph Five</p> <p>Paragraph Six</p> <p>Paragraph Seven</p> </td> <td> <svg version="1.1" width="40px" height="100%" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" > <rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="red" /> </svg> </td> </tr> </table> </body> </html> Firefox 1.5, 2 and 3 (latest nightly) consider the <svg> element's height of 100% to be the height of the browser window. Opera 9 considers the <svg> element's height of 100% as a static 150 pixels in this instance (?). Both seem wrong to me - it seems like the browser should take 100% to mean the "tallest element in the table's row" (which would be defined by the seven HTML:p elements in the other cell). Can someone tell me what the spec states about the file above and what SHOULD happen? I can do the browser bug opening, if required... Thanks, Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 21:51:21 UTC