- From: Timur Mehrvarz <timur.mehrvarz@web.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:43:31 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org, public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Hello Lofton. You are saying sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are missing. However, the previous section "2.4 Referencing Child Objects" is not missing at all. It has only changed places within the CDRF document. It can now be found under section 1.4 here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CDR/#referencing-child-objects Section "2.5 Security Considerations" has indeed been removed. The group decided to exclude the topic of security from CDRF. Section "2.3 Link Activation" has also been removed. The group felt this topic was too specific for the CDR Framework document, but is now considering to bring it back in the context of the WICD Core document. Would you be alright having the text appear in a more XHTML +SVG related context? Kind regards, Timur Mehrvarz On 13. Sep 2006, at 00:19, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > Hello CDF WG > > We wonder if you have had any thoughts about this question, that > you can share with us graphics people? > > Best, > -Lofton. > > At 03:54 PM 7/20/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >> Hello public-cdf, >> >> Looking at "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0" (LCWD of >> Dec. 2005), the WebCGM WG found the section [1] on linking and >> child documents to contain particularly interesting and valuable >> informative material. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation- >> child-documents >> >> We noticed, in the current editors draft [2] (June 2006), that >> this material is missing. (In fact, sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are >> missing.) >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml >> >> We are wondering if this is an intentional removal, or rather >> whether maybe this is just a transient development stage of the >> document that we're seeing? >> >> (Not speaking for SVG ... but as a participant of the SVG WG, I >> would voice the same opinion -- valuable material -- because these >> link-target details have progressed alternately and together in >> the two specifications, WebCGM and SVG.) >> >> Best Regards, >> Lofton Henderson >> (Chair WebCGM WG) >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 16:10:22 UTC