- From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:31:15 -0400
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-cdf@w3.org
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> wrote on 10/04/2006 05:24:08 PM:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:47:09 +0200, Steve K Speicher
<sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> There have been no changes. The only differences, as far as I can tell,
> are some square brackets and assert-hyperlinking1, assert-hyperlinking2
> and assert-hyperlinking3 being mentioned before various assertions.
>
> So no, this does not satisfy my comment for hopefully obvious reasons.
Excellent, you passed the test for actually verifying this. The new
proposed text is:
" 5 Hyperlinking
WICD compliant agents should support seamless hyperlinking
originating from any of the supported document formats to all
supported content types. If it is possible to link from XHTML to some
other supported content type (for example: XHTML linking to RSS, Java
or multimedia content), then it should also be possible to link to
the same content types from any other supported document format which
supports hyperlinking (for example: SVG linking to RSS, Java or
multimedia content).
If linking from XHTML to any of the supported content types will
result in content type specific treatment, then linking to that same
format from any other supported document format (such as from SVG)
should result in the same content type specific treatment.
If a WICD compliant agent supports linking from XHTML to URI
schemes other than http:// (for examples wtai://, pcast://, etc.),
then these URI schemes should also be supported, when linked-to from
any of the other supported document formats that support hyperlinking
(such as from SVG).
All URI schemes, supported for hyperlinking and the related
functionality, should be supported, independent of the originating
document format."
It is part of member-only draft now.
> > LC#73, ACTION-379
Please let us know within two weeks if you don't agree with these changes.
Regards,
Steve Speicher on behalf of the CDF WG.
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:31:26 UTC