Comments on CC/PP 2.0 Last Call: Conformance criteria

Conformance criteria, section 5.1

Entry #1 says

"The document MUST be valid RDF serialized in XML".

The introduction says that XML (ie, RDF/XML) is only one of the possible
serializations. I presume this entry should simply say

"The document MUST be valid RDF in some serialization format".

Also, Entry #2 seems to be a pretty meaningless requirement in the sense
that any serialization of RDF that is valid also means conformance to a
valid syntax to namespaces. That is _not_ a CC/PP requirement but simply
a valid RDF serialization requirement. The same holds for Entry #5: it
refers to the way a valid serialization handles URI-s. Nothing special
to CC/PP

Ivan

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf