- From: stephane boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:00:45 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org
Dear Ivan, Thank you for your comment on CC/PP: Structure and vocabularies 2.0 ([1]) Your comment on the "Components in the CC/PP Structure Section" ([2]) has been referenced as LC-1772. Please use this reference for further discussion on this mailing-list. From a purely RDF perspective you are completly right: there could be a way to integrate in the ccpp-schema the definition of the UAProf component through one of the ways you are mentionning. That said, as it is explicitly said, in order to ensure compatibility with UAProf now, as it is defined today, it is essential to allow the use of the UAPRof component. In case, we would work with OMA on a next release of cc/pp 2, we would surely integrate this comment and make sure that only one component is defined. It's also worth noting that the wording in the new version of the spec is identical with that in the previous version of the spec which is a W3C recommendation and presumably was acceptable to everyone at the time. We're not seeking to change anything that was agreed in the first version apart from those changes that caused divergence from the ability to support UAProf. As a result the WG rejects this comment. Please let us know if you agree with this decision. Best Regards, On behalf of the UWA WG, Stephane Boyera [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab2-20070430/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ccpp2-comments/2007Jun/0001.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/ccpp2/ -- -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 34 BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 17 August 2007 09:01:03 UTC