- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:22:03 -0600
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF8920A81C.016DCC3F-ON86257DB3.006FD057-86257DB3.006FE1C0@us.ibm.com>
Sam, You had set said last week that there would be a meeting today. Mark and I showed and nobody else was on. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> To: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> Date: 12/18/2014 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Canvas Task Force Meeting - 2014/12/19 On 12/12/2014 03:13 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > I had the link wrong, the passcode didn't work, and we didn't have > quorum; so this meeting has been rescheduled. > > A corrected link for next week: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20141219T20 > > We also have an update, bug 27264 has been fixed. I'd appreciate it if > everybody verified this fix and speak up if there is anything else that > needs to be done before we return to LC (old process) or CR (new process). Paul reminded me that there are two bugs open: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=CR%20HTML%20Canvas%202D%20Context&list_id=49384&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced Can the editors look at the following two bugs, and propose resolutions? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26977 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25309 Thanks! - Sam Ruby > On 12/10/2014 11:29 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Friday 19:00-21:00 UTC (3:00pm-4:00pm Boston local) >> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20141212T19 >> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 226827 ("CANVAS") >> IRC: #canvas-api on irc.w3.org port 6665 or port 80 >> >> Topics: >> >> 1) https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27264 >> If we get this bug fixed, we can return to LC or CR? >> >> 2) https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test >> Still a lot of "fill in" cells, as well as partial passes. >> >> 3) >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014OctDec/0044.html >> >> Consensus is to keep with the 2005 process for this document? >> >> - Sam Ruby >>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 20:22:38 UTC