Re: canvas, TPAC, and CR testing

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
wrote:

> Sam,
>
> At the last meeting we dicussed meeting times on Canvas at the face to
> face. This is proving to be problematic:
>
> 1. SVG, HTML, and PF all meet on the same 2 days at the face to face
> meeting
> 2. I am a member of all 3 working groups
> 3. PF has scheduled my time in group sessions with HTML, SVG, Digital
> Publishing, and CSS as well as ARIA.next the last day.
>
> I don't have any control over the scheduling of TPAC but since we never
> got around to scheduling exact times for things like Canvas until now I
> don't see any bandwidth for participating in an canvas discussion now. Mark
> will have time and will have changes to the canvas spec. based on
> implementations and will be able to bring those changes to the working
> group for Canvas 1.
>
> Mark has completed many of the test cases and testing on the test cases I
> specified. I am working with him on areas where there is confusion. Mark is
> now into the hit region testing and he is working on the scroll testing. He
> has been filing bugs on the browser manufacturers. So, a lot of progress
> has been made. I envision a quick jump back to last call and then a rapid
> pass through CR assuming implementation testing continues to go the way it
> has - very well.
>
> It would be nice if there was a way to expedite this round trip like HTML
> has done. Is that possible?
>
Hi Rich,
are you envisioning substantive changes to the spec or is this just about
clarifying existing features? If it is the latter, we can stay in CR.