Mark,
I understand that. While that is true, the approach that Lisa was talking
about in concept is in concept what she was asking for so there is no need
to have an alternative shadow DOM strategy.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, "lisa.seeman"
<lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org"
<public-canvas-api@w3.org>
Date: 08/19/2014 09:22 AM
Subject: Re: Shadow Dom stuff
Sent by: mark.sadecki@gmail.com
I think its probably best to refer to it as fallback content in canvas. I
know associate Shadow DOM with the work that is being done in Web
Components.
mark
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
Canvas fallback content is a shadow DOM of sorts. I am confused.
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Inactive hide details for Rik Cabanier ---08/15/2014 01:29:11 PM---On
Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:57 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoRik Cabanier
---08/15/2014 01:29:11 PM---On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:57 AM, lisa.seeman
<lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > Hi Folks
From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>
Date: 08/15/2014 01:29 PM
Subject: Re: Shadow Dom stuff
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:57 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
wrote:
Hi Folks
I was thinking that we need people to use the shadow DOM to make
existing inaccessible Canvas implementations accessible and see
how hard it is and how to explain how to do it to developers.
(With the understanding that we can not get everything working yet
- like magnification.)
Is anyone working on this?
Can you rephrase the question? Are you asking if someone is educating
authors?
Why would magnification not work?
